Scary Customer Encounter at GM

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Manatee

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 18, 2011
    2,359
    48
    Indiana
    Ruger really botched this in my opinion. First of all, it is not a 45. Most people know this after the first encounter with the literature on the pistol or talking to a seller. Second, if it has a 1911 grip style, then it conceivably could be called a 22/1911.

    It isn't the customer who is stupid. It's the Ruger engineer or marketing troll.
     

    Dirtebiker

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    49   0   0
    Feb 13, 2011
    7,091
    63
    Greenwood
    Ruger really botched this in my opinion. First of all, it is not a 45. Most people know this after the first encounter with the literature on the pistol or talking to a seller. Second, if it has a 1911 grip style, then it conceivably could be called a 22/1911.

    It isn't the customer who is stupid. It's the Ruger engineer or marketing troll.
    Ruger engineers= stupid? .....um, ok
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,824
    149
    Valparaiso
    I have to agree that the name of the Ruger 22/45 seems to be the result of: "OK, we've got a great gun....we have have to launch it tomorrow, what are we going to call it?"
     

    vork08

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 10, 2011
    84
    8
    NWI
    Ruger really botched this in my opinion. First of all, it is not a 45. Most people know this after the first encounter with the literature on the pistol or talking to a seller. Second, if it has a 1911 grip style, then it conceivably could be called a 22/1911.

    It isn't the customer who is stupid. It's the Ruger engineer or marketing troll.


    IMHO, Ruger marketing did OK on this one. I have had at least 5 people that I have taken to the range and introduced them to handguns that have said "I really like the feel of the .45, but the .22 is a lot more fun. Do they make a .22 with the feel of a .45?" 2 of them ended up getting the Ruger 22/45 because of the description of a .22 on a .45 frame.
     
    Top Bottom