Ruger warranty sucks
[FONT=&]Why No Warranty Card Has Been Packed With Your New Ruger® Firearm?
The Magnuson-Moss Act (Public Law 93-637) does not require any seller or manufacturer of a consumer product to give a written warranty. It does provide that if a written warranty is given, it must be designated as "limited" or as "full" and sets minimum standards for a "full" warranty. Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. has elected not to provide any written warranty, either "limited" or "full", rather than to attempt to comply with the provisions of the Magnuson-Moss Act and the regulations issued thereunder. There are certain implied warranties under state law with respect to sales of consumer goods. As the extent and interpretation of these implied warranties varies from state to state, you should refer to your state statutes. Sturm, Ruger & Company wishes to assure its customers of its continued interest in providing service to owners of Ruger® firearms.
Dan Wesson warranty still sucks but slightly less (5 years).
You can pick up the comparable DW model for about $1450 on gun broker , the Ruger has a couple more bells and whistles but it is 1750 wish.
Paying big bucks for a gun that the manufacturer does not have the guts to stand behind does not thrill me.
STI on the other hand:[/FONT]
THE STI WARRANTY.
STI strives to provide our customers with the highest quality, most reliable guns possible. Simply put, if it breaks we fix it. Normal use, abuse or neglect of proper maintenance care are excluded. We stand behind the guns we build.
If I bought based on warranty, I'd buy a Hyundai over a Lexus.
Warranties are next to worthless anyway. SERVICE is what matters. And quality that means I'll likely never need it.