What no .45acp 2.0?
Isn't the 45 ACP already essentially a 2.0 of the Shield? I think it has all the features of a 2.0
I have officialy switched back to shield from glock 43.
Reasons for switching:
- Holds 1 more round with the flush magazine and 2 more rounds with the extended mag than the 43. With single stack pistols every extra round you have is an advantage.
- mag release is easier to use without breaking my grip
- Comes with metal sights standard from the factory
- less felt recoil and easier to grip therefore better accuracy.
- crowned barrel and barrel doesn't stick out past the slide so less likely to be damaged if dropped or hit on the front.
- cheaper
These are my own reasons. Your experiences may vary. I have a lot of rounds down range with both pistols, not just a couple mags. So I've based my decisions on what's best for me.
Interesting. I like my G43 but I am not married to it. A Shield 2.0 would be something to consider. Still don't care for the triggers of the ones I have handled though.
My old shield was one of the only tolerable factory triggers I've ever had. If it wasn't a .40, I would have never sold it.
Now.....My glock 43's stock trigger.....that thing is borderline unusable.
Looks like all they did was add some stippling and unusable front slide serrations..... Doesn't seem like much of an upgrade, and with the original versions selling for well under $300 with extra mags, why would anyone buy an M2 version for over $400???
Am I missing something?
If I ever decide to carry a single stack 9mm again I would gladly pick up another Shield. I've owned several and they are IMO one of the best on the market. I recommend them to people frequently for most of the reasons that TT mentioned.