I say bring it on. I wish I would have been up in South Bend last weekend (38" in a couple days). It would have given me a reason to finally use the 4WD on my new pick-up. Maybe the next storm will hit here. Then all the bad drivers will stay home
I say bring it on. I wish I would have been up in South Bend last weekend (38" in a couple days). It would have given me a reason to finally use the 4WD on my new pick-up. Maybe the next storm will hit here. Then all the bad drivers will stay home
i love driving in the snow. i got a jeep on 33's so bring on the snow lol
Man, sounds like you're describing my old CJ5! I miss it.
I still have a Blazer that I can have fun with, though.
Josh
Move.
lol mines an 02 wrangler. i dont ever want to get rid of it
Didn't want to get rid of mine, either. Problem was I had too much power flowing through it and was tearing up the AMC 20 rear. Blew it out twice, and driveshaft U-joints would bust at a year, max (the good ones).
This was with regular driving!
Won't lay out what all I did to it right now, but suffice to say it had more power than anything that size should have had. On the street, it beat Camaros on a regular basis -- and I'm talking the Z71 package. The only one I raced and couldn't beat was someone I knew on the sheriff's dept who had a police package Camaro.
My one problem, though, man, was that rear axle. This was a '76 CJ5, and they had discontinued the use of the Dana 44 rear in 1975. I would have killed for a Dana 44 to match the Dana 30 front, but unfortunately, they no longer make 'em.
On your '02, I'm wanting to say you have a Dana 35 rear and Dana 30 front, unless Chrysler swapped in a corporate axle rear or you opted for a heavier-duty package, in which case you may have a Dana 44. I was looking at Wrangler axles, but they would have stuck out way too far. The CJ's stance was not as wide. The Wrangler was created because folks didn't know how to properly drive the CJs and kept rolling 'em.
The main difference between the CJ and the Wrangler from an offroading perspective is that the CJ's frame was part of the suspension and was built to flex to keep the wheels on the ground. Going slow I could see and hear everything flexing, almost like a living creature. It was kinda' weird.
The new type Wrangler uses coil springs to achieve the same goal. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. I do think I'd sooner take the leaf springs just because I'm used to driving 'em, but that's a personal preference and is in no way intended to belittle the coil springs of the modern Wrangler. I actually do think the coil springs might be a bit more versatile, but it's largely a 1911 vs XDm thing. (Glock would be a Ford of some sort *shudder*).
Please just tell me that when you go muddin' you lose the top and doors and experience it like it was meant to be experienced!
Josh
The only one I raced and couldn't beat was someone I knew on the sheriff's dept who had a police package Camaro.
so it beat you because it had a better cooling package???
lol I try to keep the interior looking decent so i usually don't. Personally i love the 4 link coils front and rear. I had an old XJ and it had leafs in the back and i wasn't really a fan of them. but about my axles i have a D30 up front and a D44 in the rear. Not sure if its from the factory or not. thats one main thing i looked at before i bought my 33's because the D35 is basically a piece of crap and those 33's would tear that axle up in no time. so now my weak link is the D30 because its the low pinion which means all th power is in reverse. I'd like to swap it out for a D30 high pinion so that the power is when moving forward.
Tony