I liked that the child tax credit went up $1,000 per kid. That's a reduction in $2k taxes right off the top.
We paid $1617 less this year, because our taxable income went up slightly.
Our effective income tax rate was 17.45% when you account for ALL the money Uncle Sugar took.
I liked that the child tax credit went up $1,000 per kid. That's a reduction in $2k taxes right off the top.
I know raising children is expensive but I still do not accept that I should subsidize someone else's family.
I "loaded up" 2018. My church probably is not happy about getting a whole lot of cash in December, but then lean in spring...If you are right at the boarder line for itemizing consider using a strategy called Bunching.
I know raising children is expensive but I still do not accept that I should subsidize someone else's family.
We now have 2 kids who are adults, so we're down to 2 minor children. We will once again be itemizing.
Funny how the same time the child tax credit goes away, the expenses of this "children" hit an all-time high with the older two in college.
Anyhoo, I'm still waiting on my K-1, so I don't have final numbers yet, but so far, things are looking up....or at least not down.
On the plus side, my older son is graduation from college in 2 months (less outlay for me) and already has accepted an offer of a good job with decent salary, health insurance and matching 401k...and he's already complaining about the taxes as he figures out his budget.
...My good news is that my house should be paid off when he's a sophomore in college.
How do you feel about subsidizing the people who will pay for your Social Security and Medicare? I guarantee that as long as those programs are around, you'll get more out of them than they got out of you.
Yes but I don't have kids, so it is unfair and wrong.
I DO have a kid, and that's unfair and wrong!
I’m not following? If you didn’t itemize because it wasn’t over the standard deduction, you should have paid less using the sd?
What I am getting at is that there are several elements in the tax code have nothing to do with revenue. They are about encouraging and discouraging behavior.
Want people to save for retirement? Make the income saved tax deferred. Want people to invest in a business and leav it to the next generation? Lower or eliminate inheritance tax. Want people to invest in their businesses? Lower or eliminate capital gains tax, want people to have children who will be future taxpayers? Formulate deductions and credits to encourage it.
Rest assured, you are not subsidizing anyone. In order for that to even arguably happen, the federal government would have to hold itself strictly to a budget that is balanced, It does not. It spends the money whether it gets it or not. Someone paying less taxes does not raise your taxes. Tax cuts do not have to be "paid for". That is liberal claptrap.
BTW- one who draws SS and had no children will not even come close to funding his own SS benefits.
I had 4 children who will be paying into the system when I retire. I will have done a lot more to fund SS benefits during my retirement than anyone who did not have children. It currently takes 2.9 workers to fund the SS benefits of the average retiree. You're welcome.
I still hate that we have to play the, "guess what your bill is!" game every year. IRS, YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER!!!!
ugh...