Taxes, taxes, taxes and LESS TAXES... wait, what?!?!?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ATOMonkey

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    7,635
    48
    Plainfield
    Ah yes...

    Being hitched does have it's benefits.

    Still, the standard deduction is twice what it was last year, regardless of marital status, correct?
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Unless you can itemize $24,000 worth of deductions, you'll be taking the standard.

    So, in years past, that was not a problem. (Not by design really, just because that's how we live.)

    Some of the changes impacted the extent to which we could make certain deductions - like the mortgage interest and state taxes.

    I basically have to itemize like I always do to determine if I exceed the $24k. Which means it could be an exercise in futility.

    Which isn't that different than past years, in that respect.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    104,353
    149
    Southside Indy
    Ah yes...

    Being hitched does have it's benefits.

    Still, the standard deduction is twice what it was last year, regardless of marital status, correct?

    Yep, that's correct. Looks like they're going up a little for 2019 (filing 2020).

    Standard Deduction Amounts. The standard deduction amounts will increase to $12,200 for individuals, $18,350 for heads of household, and $24,400 for married couples filing jointly and surviving spouses.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyp...dard-deduction-amounts-and-more/#2bb21e392081
     

    SheepDog4Life

    Natural Gray Man
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    May 14, 2016
    5,320
    113
    SW IN
    My income went up almost exactly 5% in 2018. (Odd coincidence, but it happens.) My taxes owed went up ~10%. (Still working on it, but it looks like it'll be in that range.)

    Not. Happy.

    This is how progressive taxes work... if your taxes only went up by 5% also, that would be borderline regressive :)
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    This is how progressive taxes work... if your taxes only went up by 5% also, that would be borderline regressive :)

    :)

    I understand how its supposed to work. :)

    And, if I'd crossed into a higher bracket, it would make sense. (I was literally about 1% away from a higher bracket last year. I couldn't have gotten any closer if I'd tried!)

    Instead, I'm at a lower percentage bracket, but paying a higher percentage of my income in taxes.

    I also recognize that I'm probably in the minority on this. But (because I voted?) I can still complain. ;)
     

    KMaC

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 4, 2016
    1,539
    83
    Indianapolis
    Ah yes...

    Being hitched does have it's benefits.

    Still, the standard deduction is twice what it was last year, regardless of marital status, correct?

    But the personal exemption has been eliminated. The new standard deduction is slightly more than the old personal exemption plus the standard deduction.
     

    KMaC

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 4, 2016
    1,539
    83
    Indianapolis
    You guys made me curious how I came out in the Trump tax reform.
    Background, I'm single, filed standard deductions both 2017 and 2018.
    My income went up 27% in 2018 due to receiving Social Security.
    While I paid a couple thousand more in taxes this year my tax liability (Percent of Adjusted gross income amount due for taxes) went down .9%.
    I'm not interested enough to recalculate my 2017 taxes with 2018 income to see an exact savings in dollars, the tax reform has saved me money.
     

    Hohn

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jul 5, 2012
    4,444
    63
    USA
    If nothing else, this year's tax season will show many people just how little that nominal rate has to do with actually calculating their taxes.

    I'm thrilled at the SALT deduction being capped. Heck, I was hoping it would be eliminated. Why?

    With full deductibility of SALT taxes, those who vote for higher and higher taxes end up getting subsidized by people who live in lower cost-more frugal areas. And since those high cost of living areas are overwhelmingly wealthy and liberal, I viewed it as a chance to get those folks who always want more spending and who claim to be OK with having their taxes raised to show just how much of a fan they are of the gov't do-good schemes.

    It's perverse to reduce someone's FEDERAL taxation based on how much LOCAL tax they pay. They voted for that local tax (in most cases) and in all cases, chose to remain located there. Let them feel the full burden of that decision, and not offload that burden to those who've chosen more modest and lest costly local government.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    I'm interested to hear how the change in itemized deductions has affected LEOS. In some places it might be a pretty significant hit.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    If nothing else, this year's tax season will show many people just how little that nominal rate has to do with actually calculating their taxes.

    I'm thrilled at the SALT deduction being capped. Heck, I was hoping it would be eliminated. Why?

    With full deductibility of SALT taxes, those who vote for higher and higher taxes end up getting subsidized by people who live in lower cost-more frugal areas. And since those high cost of living areas are overwhelmingly wealthy and liberal, I viewed it as a chance to get those folks who always want more spending and who claim to be OK with having their taxes raised to show just how much of a fan they are of the gov't do-good schemes.

    It's perverse to reduce someone's FEDERAL taxation based on how much LOCAL tax they pay. They voted for that local tax (in most cases) and in all cases, chose to remain located there. Let them feel the full burden of that decision, and not offload that burden to those who've chosen more modest and lest costly local government.

    Hi. I'm here in Indiana. I kinda preferred not having to pay taxes to the feds on income that was taken from me by my state and county.
     

    PaulJF

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    May 3, 2010
    284
    34
    Linden
    Due to illness our income decreased by 23%. We changed nothing in withholding. We usually owe both state and federal at tax time. This year we are receiving a substantial refund from federal and enough from state to pay our accountant for filing. I haven't had the time or energy to figure our actual liability vs last year.
     

    jedi

    Da PinkFather
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    51   0   0
    Oct 27, 2008
    37,837
    113
    NWI, North of US-30
    short summary
    in the end uncle sam still wins, just like the house always wins in poker. uncle sam is not in the biz of lossing. ingo member 1 might win but those winnings are offset by ingo member 2 and 3 having lost much more.
     
    Top Bottom