The Box O' Truth - Fighting With a Shotgun

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • snowman

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    18   0   0
    Jul 5, 2010
    349
    16
    Bremen, IN
    Not sure I agree with his scanning info. I have always been taught to keep the muzzle pointed where you look. This applies even more when a flashlight is attached to the barrel.
     

    figley

    Expert
    Rating - 94.7%
    18   1   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    1,036
    38
    SW Indy
    Not sure I agree with his scanning info. I have always been taught to keep the muzzle pointed where you look. This applies even more when a flashlight is attached to the barrel.

    Taught by whom? I believe O_P did this BoT shortly after a class with Clint Smith, or someone of equal esteem.
     

    gunman41mag

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 1, 2011
    10,485
    48
    SOUTH of YOU
    Lately I've been hearing a lot of people saying the shotgun isn't a good weapon, guess I wasted my money on two BENELLI M1 SUPER 90 & a BERETTA 1201 FP:rolleyes:
     

    figley

    Expert
    Rating - 94.7%
    18   1   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    1,036
    38
    SW Indy
    Lately I've been hearing a lot of people saying the shotgun isn't a good weapon, guess I wasted my money on two BENELLI M1 SUPER 90 & a BERETTA 1201 FP:rolleyes:

    You'll be fine, if you're ever attacked by a bunch of geese!


    There is a school of thought, that subscribes to the idea that, outside of hunting applications, there is nothing a shotgun can do, that an AR-15 can't do as well, or better. Considering the wide variety of 5.56/.223 loads made publicly available in the past couple of years, that belief is, in large part, valid. Use of a shotgun for defensive purposes is, to some, outdated.

    As O_P, and many respected instructors and combat vets can attest, the shotgun can still be an effective fighting tool. There are a variety of loads available for the shotgun, also, which can be tailored to a variety of situations.

    For someone who can't, or doesn't want to, pay for an AR, a shotgun is a viable alternative. There are also those who believe a shotgun is just downright better.

    Do your research, make your own decision. :dunno:
     

    gunman41mag

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 1, 2011
    10,485
    48
    SOUTH of YOU
    You'll be fine, if you're ever attacked by a bunch of geese!


    There is a school of thought, that subscribes to the idea that, outside of hunting applications, there is nothing a shotgun can do, that an AR-15 can't do as well, or better. Considering the wide variety of 5.56/.223 loads made publicly available in the past couple of years, that belief is, in large part, valid. Use of a shotgun for defensive purposes is, to some, outdated.

    As O_P, and many respected instructors and combat vets can attest, the shotgun can still be an effective fighting tool. There are a variety of loads available for the shotgun, also, which can be tailored to a variety of situations.

    For someone who can't, or doesn't want to, pay for an AR, a shotgun is a viable alternative. There are also those who believe a shotgun is just downright better.

    Do your research, make your own decision. :dunno:
    My BENELLI M1 SUPER 90 & BERETTA 1201 FP weren't cheap, I'm sure thur-out history, shotgun have killed bad people;) maybe those were lucky shots:rolleyes: Maybe if a GRIZZLY bear is coming at you, you'll drop the BENELLI M1 with 8 rounds of slugs & use your ar-15 with the 55 gr. ammo:):
     

    pokersamurai

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Dec 30, 2008
    798
    27
    LaPorte
    There is a school of thought, that subscribes to the idea that, outside of hunting applications, there is nothing a shotgun can do, that an AR-15 can't do as well, or better. Considering the wide variety of 5.56/.223 loads made publicly available in the past couple of years, that belief is, in large part, valid. Use of a shotgun for defensive purposes is, to some, outdated.

    I've had several friends tell me the same thing when I told them I use a shotgun for home defense. I do think ARs are great weapons, however, if I only had one shot to stop a 6'2" 250lb bad guy nothing beats 9 pellets of 00 buck.
     

    TopDog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    19   0   0
    Nov 23, 2008
    6,906
    48
    Live and learn.

    Everything changes. At one time a shotgun was considered an ideal self defense weapon. I always had a very low opinion of the M16 platform. But now that light has shown on the gas system and more and more people are going to a piston gas system similar to the ever reliable AK the M16 / AR15 platform is more appealing, for it has become far more reliable.

    I'm not plunking down AR money when I'm very confident in my shotguns. The AR has its place certainly but not going to convert me just yet. God forbid I have to engage in a full out fire fight with a fire team or larger force, then I would be begging for a AR.
     

    figley

    Expert
    Rating - 94.7%
    18   1   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    1,036
    38
    SW Indy
    My BENELLI M1 SUPER 90 & BERETTA 1201 FP weren't cheap, I'm sure thur-out history, shotgun have killed bad people;) maybe those were lucky shots:rolleyes: Maybe if a GRIZZLY bear is coming at you, you'll drop the BENELLI M1 with 8 rounds of slugs & use your ar-15 with the 55 gr. ammo:):

    This saves me the trouble of explaining why I feel a rifle is better :ar15:
     

    figley

    Expert
    Rating - 94.7%
    18   1   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    1,036
    38
    SW Indy
    I've had several friends tell me the same thing when I told them I use a shotgun for home defense. I do think ARs are great weapons, however, if I only had one shot to stop a 6'2" 250lb bad guy nothing beats 9 pellets of 00 buck.


    If your mind is open to accepting new information, that may contradict what you always believed to be true, do some research on the effects of bullet fragmentation.

    Here's a good place to start: :: Ammo Oracle
     

    pokersamurai

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Dec 30, 2008
    798
    27
    LaPorte
    If your mind is open to accepting new information, that may contradict what you always believed to be true, do some research on the effects of bullet fragmentation.

    Here's a good place to start: :: Ammo Oracle

    Believe it or not, I do have an AR, and I have researched the effects of fragmenting ammo. I know the .223/5.56 is very deadly especially in its fragmenting variations, and if I were in a SHTF situation where I might need to engage multiple threats at longer range there is no doubt that a rifle is the better weapon. However, from a home defense view point where you might be engaging one, maybe two, bad guys; a shotgun loaded with 00 buck fires 9 .33 caliber, 53.8gr projectiles at once, compared to an AR that fires one .223 caliber, 55gr projectile at a time. Even if the .223 round fragments I would take 9 projectiles at once vs 1 at a time any day of the week.
     

    pokersamurai

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Dec 30, 2008
    798
    27
    LaPorte
    Although, if I were a bad guy I wouldn't want to get hit with either of these. :D

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m2vaJCBQTs&feature=plcp&context=C4714b83VDvjVQa1PpcFOG_AU40wZt1wQ3WhrNZMibPY-evfAWGTI=[/ame]


    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNBFS3HWoIU&feature=plcp&context=C4d59e75VDvjVQa1PpcFOG_AU40wZt1xrnqEWhnF_GtfQeMIr7RzI=[/ame]
     

    bingley

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 11, 2011
    2,295
    48
    Should the weapon choice depend on the competence of the user? I think we're arguing in the abstract, assuming that the user is an expert with all types of firearms. How often do we get to train with our firearms? Which variety do you spend the most time with? I'd just go with the one I'm most comfortable with that is sufficient for home defense (i.e., no 22LR). I'd even forego a more powerful weapon that I'm not as good at using.
     

    figley

    Expert
    Rating - 94.7%
    18   1   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    1,036
    38
    SW Indy
    Should the weapon choice depend on the competence of the user? I think we're arguing in the abstract, assuming that the user is an expert with all types of firearms. How often do we get to train with our firearms? Which variety do you spend the most time with? I'd just go with the one I'm most comfortable with that is sufficient for home defense (i.e., no 22LR). I'd even forego a more powerful weapon that I'm not as good at using.


    You are correct. Simplicity in manipulation is a concern for a shooter who is unfamiliar. Some shooters may be more familiar with one type of gun over another.

    Effectiveness of ammo may be objective, but that doesn't override the very subjective factor that is the person behind the gun. The latter is most influential in determining the effectiveness of the whole combination.

    This conversation is similar to the one in which we argue that any gun that you'll carry, beats the ideal gun you leave at home. :draw:
     

    Slawburger

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Mar 26, 2012
    3,041
    48
    Almost Southern IN
    Shotguns are fairly simple and might be less likely to confuse or intimidate a user with limited experience. They don't require much accuracy in a hallway. The sound of a shotgun going off is a strong incentive for people to leave the area (if the sound of a pump action being cycled wasn't enough).
     
    Top Bottom