The Top Tier is Dead.

[WWIIIDefender]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBWU2p66Jvs&feature=youtu.be

 

[Chefcook]

[ame]http://youtu.be/RBWU2p66Jvs[/ame]

Very good...

 

[B27R]

that video ended JUST in time on the Romney piece. I threw up in my mouth a little bit.

Here's the most sensible political ad I've seen:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhDhDRvHaGs[/ame]

 

[teddy12b]

http://youtu.be/RBWU2p66Jvs

Very good...

Great video!

 

[Packrat67]

Videos are nice but dacts are facts

Nice videos ,but You guys must realize that Ron Paul has ZERO chance of getting the nomination much less being elected President of the United States. Unless you want 4 more years of the mess that we have now, time to get behind a viable canidate

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

Nice videos ,but You guys must realize that Ron Paul has ZERO chance of getting the nomination much less being elected President of the United States. Unless you want 4 more years of the mess that we have now, time to get behind a viable canidate

And that candidate is.....???????

Im in the Ron Paul or bust boat, im not wasting a vote on someone i dont support just because he's not Obama

 

[rambone]

Videos are nice but dacts are facts
Nice videos ,but You guys must realize that Ron Paul has ZERO chance of getting the nomination much less being elected President of the United States. Unless you want 4 more years of the mess that we have now, time to get behind a viable canidate

Where are these facts you speak of? Or dacts, for that matter?

 

[96firephoenix]

Nice videos ,but You guys must realize that Ron Paul has ZERO chance of getting the nomination much less being elected President of the United States. Unless you want 4 more years of the mess that we have now, time to get behind a viable canidate

Nice argument, but you must realize that anyone who isn't Ron Paul has ZERO chance of not giving us more of the same. Unless you want 4 more years of the mess we have now, time to get behind Ron Paul.

 

[Manan]

And that candidate is.....???????

Im in the Ron Paul or bust boat, im not wasting a vote on someone i dont support just because he's not Obama

What you hopefully really mean is that in the primary you are a Ron Paul guy. But in the general election you will vote for whomever is on the ballot against the socialist that is in there now????

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

What you hopefully really mean is that in the primary you are a Ron Paul guy. But in the general election you will vote for whomever is on the ballot against the socialist that is in there now????

No, i said what i mean. I will not be casting ANY vote for a candidate i DONT support, and short of Ron Paul, im not seeing anyone thats going to even TRY to change business as usual politicks in DC.

 

[Lead Head]

And that candidate is.....???????

Im in the Ron Paul or bust boat, im not wasting a vote on someone i dont support just because he's not Obama

I understand the above position and recall similar personal convictions when I voted for Ross Perot. The era was veryyyy different with much less to lose and to this day I don't regret my vote.

Things have drastically changed since then and it seems to me that much more is at stake. But, at the end of the day we must live with our choices.

Another 4 years (actually 5) of this crap and where will we be ?

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

I understand the above position and recall similar personal convictions when I voted for Ross Perot. The era was veryyyy different with much less to lose and to this day I don't regret my vote.

Things have drastically changed since then and it seems to me that much more is at stake. But, at the end of the day we must live with our choices.

Another 4 years (actually 5) of this crap and where will we be ?

Whos to say if you vote for the "other" guy anything will be different? How do you know it wont be even worse?

 

[rambone]

... I voted for Ross Perot. The era was veryyyy different with much less to lose and to this day I don't regret my vote.

Things have drastically changed since then and it seems to me that much more is at stake. But, at the end of the day we must live with our choices.

Haven't we been steadily losing freedom and money? Which means we have a lot less to lose today. Just saying. At this point the status quo will no longer cut it.

 

[Manan]

Under the Obama administration we have moved from a slippery slope towards socialism to a greased slide.

The only good thing about the faster pace of change under Obama is that the sleeping masses have been able to see its obviousness and have finally begun to push back.

 

[RockofStrength]

I understand the above position and recall similar personal convictions when I voted for Ross Perot. The era was veryyyy different with much less to lose and to this day I don't regret my vote.

Things have drastically changed since then and it seems to me that much more is at stake. But, at the end of the day we must live with our choices.

Another 4 years (actually 5) of this crap and where will we be ?

Let me know when the Republican Obamas decide to stop being leftists who merely attempt to appear to be less socialist than the fellow currently in office. Another four years of Obama would be terrible, I agree. But another four years of Romney or Perry won't be better.

 

[rambone]

Why Tea Party Voters Are Returning to Ron Paul - Yahoo! News

Paul's plan boldly cuts $1 trillion in the first year and returns America to a balanced budget in his first term as president. Even more astounding is that the budget cuts come from senseless government waste and federal government duplicity, like maintaining active military bases in foreign countries a half-century after the end of the war. Paul achieves a balanced budget in just three years while keeping the government's promise to those receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits.

The tea party members have always been mindfully focused on fiscal matters, and their gradual return to Paul's candidacy and spending plan is only beginning. If, or when, the time comes for Bachmann to withdrawal from the race, an endorsement of Paul's plan seems logical for the tea party Caucus chair; since she will need to maintain her fiscal validity with the tea party members in hopes of retaining their support in the future.

 

[Mkidwe01]

Hate to burst your bubble but:

Shocker in N.H.: Poll Shows Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney in Statistical Tie - Washington Wire - WSJ

But Paul doesn't have a chance. Personally I like him the best, but to many people see him as a little weird

 

[spec4]

For those who won't vote if Paul isn't the nominee, Obama thanks you for the help. For those who say the other GOP candidates are the same as Obama, I have a question: do you think the GOP candidate would nominate the same SCOTUS nominee as Obama? Does anyone think Ruth Bader Ginsberg will hang on another four years? There is more to this election than just the self indulgence of sticking it to the RINO's to give them a message. Enough of that and the message to all of us is that Obama gets to complete his socialist dream.

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

For those who won't vote if Paul isn't the nominee, Obama thanks you for the help. For those who say the other GOP candidates are the same as Obama, I have a question: do you think the GOP candidate would nominate the same SCOTUS nominee as Obama? Does anyone think Ruth Bader Ginsberg will hang on another four years? There is more to this election than just the self indulgence of sticking it to the RINO's to give them a message. Enough of that and the message to all of us is that Obama gets to complete his socialist dream.

I didnt say i wouldnt vote, i said i wont vote for someone thats not Ron Paul .... and in another thread i clarified .... I dont see any other GOP candidate (at this point) being less harmfull to America than Obama is. My bet says the GOP WILL nominate the same SCOTUS (if not in name, then in actions).

Unless of course Dr Paul gets elected, then who knows whats going to happen, but i can guarantee it will be in the best interest of THE U.S.A.

 

[Mkidwe01]

I didnt say i wouldnt vote, i said i wont vote for someone thats not Ron Paul .... and in another thread i clarified .... I dont see any other GOP candidate (at this point) being less harmfull to America than Obama is. My bet says the GOP WILL nominate the same SCOTUS (if not in name, then in actions).

Unless of course Dr Paul gets elected, then who knows whats going to happen, but i can guarantee it will be in the best interest of THE U.S.A.

So your saying you won't be voting