If you're shooting a com-block AK with loosey-goosey specs and minute-of-coffee-mug accuracy at 100yds, then yes, run steel ammo. I tried some wolf .223 once and was disgusted.
It was very dirty; the accuracy was mediocre--like 2-3 MOA out of a rifle that could hold subMOA; and it was hot enough that once, the bolt overroad the magazine without stripping a round. That was the only time that happened out of about 6000 rounds. I'm blaming the ammo.
IDK could be QC and that round was an exception?Interesting that you would say it was that hot. All the chrono tests I've seen show it be on the light side. Maybe that round was light enough that the bolt didn't completely cycle, went back far enough to eject the empty but not load the next round?
Please tell me the part you disagree with. Where did I post anything about storing ammo or say anything about blowing up a rifle? Let me explain my post to you. I said I don't run steel case ammo and I don't like it. I then tried to make a comparison to buying a high horsepower car and running Speedway regular gasoline in it and expect it to run like it was designed to. I don't have a clue what you read.
I have actually been on a mission to find and test steel cased in my current "precision" ar, and the only one I have lol. I have plenty of brass 223 and 556, but I've been trying to find people selling or trading steel cased stuff for some of my brass. Been wanting to try out all the major brands and different weights to test the accuracy first hand
I used the Hornady Steel match 75gr until they stopped making it. It ran great in my AR and was 1.25moa. I doubt you will find any Russian made ammo that accurate in steel case.
Ok now I'm curious... Is there anything about using steel compared to brass that makes steel-cased ammo inherently less accurate?
Or rather, is it just a correlation between the fact that steel is cheaper than brass and that most steel-cased ammo manufacturers (especially Russian) are trying to produce the cheapest bulk ammo possible, which necessitates cost-saving factors other than the steel casing, including maybe cheaper bullets that are less consistent in shape, variation in powder charges from one round to the next, etc and it's those factors, not the steel casing itself, which lead to steel-cased ammo's reputation?
What bear said. The difference between Hornady steel match is the bulley used. It was their 75gr match bullet. Russian cheap ammo i think is the cheapest made bullet they can produce and push in. Having said that I have used wolf 308 in my bolt 308 it was slightly better than 2 moa. I was consistently Hitting a 12" diamond steel target at 500 yards with it. Maybe that rifle just likes cheap bullets lol. But it loves 175gr SMK that I reload for it.Ok now I'm curious... Is there anything about using steel compared to brass that makes steel-cased ammo inherently less accurate?
Or rather, is it just a correlation between the fact that steel is cheaper than brass and that most steel-cased ammo manufacturers (especially Russian) are trying to produce the cheapest bulk ammo possible, which necessitates cost-saving factors other than the steel casing, including maybe cheaper bullets that are less consistent in shape, variation in powder charges from one round to the next, etc and it's those factors, not the steel casing itself, which lead to steel-cased ammo's reputation?
IDK could be QC and that round was an exception?