Being kidnapped for not wearing a mask, potentially being subject to 6 months of forced confinement?
Hope that pension is worth it.
I hope the ensuing pain and misery is worth it.
Being kidnapped for not wearing a mask, potentially being subject to 6 months of forced confinement?
Hope that pension is worth it.
New England journal of medicine:
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
Holcomb is a RINO ..... and just another of many Marxist bolsheviks. Perhaps it’s a crude perspective but if you can smell a fart you can breathe in the COVID 19..... so your cloth mask and paper mask etc are as effective as...... nothing. But hey it looks good and gets the Bolsheviks some press time so mask up......
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Being kidnapped for not wearing a mask, potentially being subject to 6 months of forced confinement?
Hope that pension is worth it.
[FONT="]Holcomb said there won’t be any “mask police,” but violations will be considered a Class B misdemeanor, which can result in up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
Oh no. Johnson is indeed a hopeless stoner. But not every libertarian is a hopeless stoner.Well, recently, my experience being on the 'wrong' side of the mask debate, and being browbeaten to do what makes other people feel safe, has made me reconsider the hard time I gave phylodog about legalization and apologize. I had to live it to really see things from his point of view, though - so not optimistic about getting the masketeers to embrace individual liberty
Maybe Johnson isn't a hopeless stoner, maybe we just need to live closer to that intersection
Cue the 'That's from back in May, the [STRIKE]script[/STRIKE] science has [STRIKE]been to re-write[/STRIKE] evolved since then' canard in 3 ... 2 ... 1
I've decided to write in Jim Lucas for governor this Nov
I could go with “ignorant fools”.If this is true, then someone is asking me to trust the judgement of "experts" that JUST NOW learned that masks are suddenly effective at preventing COVID spread. Which means either the new "science" is bunk, or the so-called experts were ignorant fools that don't deserve trust anyway.
Hint-- it's the former. If you dive into the studies that "prove" masks work, it's weak sauce. Things like "this country masked and this country didn't and look at the difference!".
Curtis Hill for Governor of Indiana?
You know, the seat belt laws got passed state by state by corporations setting up phony citizen groups.
It's was really quite a story at the time but was a story very hard to find.
LOLI bring all my dead friends in to sign as well...............Too soon.....
More like AG Hill is repaying Holcomb for calling for his resignation based on the flimsy allegations against him. The holcomb/hill thing is personal. That's the only way I can see this.
If this is true, then someone is asking me to trust the judgement of "experts" that JUST NOW learned that masks are suddenly effective at preventing COVID spread. Which means either the new "science" is bunk, or the so-called experts were ignorant fools that don't deserve trust anyway.
Hint-- it's the former. If you dive into the studies that "prove" masks work, it's weak sauce. Things like "this country masked and this country didn't and look at the difference!".
The people citing these studies as "proof" are too ignorant to know why the studies are crap. And the politicians relying on them are both too ignorant to understand them and too cowardly to reject the narrative anyway.
Isn't it interesting that the only "experts" we're supposed to listen to are the ones telling the politicians what they want to hear? A lot like the climate change scam-- "science" has spoken because only pre-screened scientists are allowed to speak.