Today's You Can't Make This Sh*t Up News

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    103,565
    149
    Southside Indy
    GJK9p1j.jpeg


    ZQgxvDK.jpeg


    xJTFudr.jpeg


    I will never understand why the right wants to ally with people who hate our history and culture to such a degree they call for its censorship.
    The right? Forward is a Jewish Independent Nonprofit (apparently). American Jews (for reasons that escape me) have been overwhelmingly supporting the left. :scratch:
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,851
    113
    North Central
    The right? Forward is a Jewish Independent Nonprofit (apparently). American Jews (for reasons that escape me) have been overwhelmingly supporting the left. :scratch:
    The reasons escape me as well but I was told they fear Christians more than the leftists but that may be changing before our eyes…
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,227
    77
    Porter County
    The left would be all for protecting minor's access to pornography, I've seen countless editorials about how kids should be able to receive porn, so I think you're dramatically underestimating that.

    If you haven't noticed, look at what they defend being pushed in front of school kids.
    You really think this law will stop anyone from accessing that site that really wants to? It's nothing more than a feel good measure.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,851
    113
    North Central
    You really think this law will stop anyone from accessing that site that really wants to? It's nothing more than a feel good measure.
    And quickly kids will know how and parents will not know how to stop them.

    That is like blocking TV channels for the kids, parents read the manual and lock channels, kids turn it off easily without the manual. :lmfao:
     

    Nazgul

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Dec 2, 2012
    2,591
    113
    Near the big river.
    The left would be all for protecting minor's access to pornography, I've seen countless editorials about how kids should be able to receive porn, so I think you're dramatically underestimating that.

    If you haven't noticed, look at what they defend being pushed in front of school kids.
    Working as a Teacher's Aide in a conservative rural High School I took my class to the library to check out books. Back in the room there was a minor commotion with lots of laughter at one desk. The book he had had naked women in cartoon drawings, very accurate naked women. I immediately took it to the librarian, who is a good friend and she was appalled and unaware it was there. It was removed.

    Still the potential is there for material of this nature too be in any school is there.

    Like any adult male I am not opposed to a laugh at crude material but it is has to be very age appropriate. Young men/women are not sufficiently equipped mentally to keep things like this in a proper view point. We don't let 10 year olds drive, smoke, vape or vote for the same reason.

    Don
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,089
    113
    Martinsville
    That is such a stupid argument.

    Your argument is that because some fraction of people will break the law, that there's no point in having the law.

    I'm saying that entire basis is ridiculous, as it would mean legitimately every single law we have is moot.

    There's 2 sides to laws, the optimistic "hope" of limiting the crime. And the more real application, the application of justice for violating the law. Who ever is facilitating children accessing this material should be charged, just as they would be charged for handing a minor a pornographic magazine currently. It's already the law, effectively, the law just hasn't caught up with technology.
     

    JCSR

    NO STAGE PLAN
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 11, 2017
    9,027
    133
    Santa Claus
    The pair share a single body, and from the waist down, all their organs, including the intestine, bladder and reproductive organs, are shared.

    So Abby married the guy but Brittany did not? How is that gonna work? :scratch:

     

    rhamersley

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 9, 2016
    3,737
    113
    Danville
    The pair share a single body, and from the waist down, all their organs, including the intestine, bladder and reproductive organs, are shared.

    So Abby married the guy but Brittany did not? How is that gonna work? :scratch:

    Guess the thought of a threesome every night hooked the guy...
     

    Ark

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Feb 18, 2017
    6,818
    113
    Indy
    The pair share a single body, and from the waist down, all their organs, including the intestine, bladder and reproductive organs, are shared.

    So Abby married the guy but Brittany did not? How is that gonna work? :scratch:

    My pick for weird news of the day, too.

    Honestly pretty remarkable that they seem alive and well at 34.
     

    JCSR

    NO STAGE PLAN
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 11, 2017
    9,027
    133
    Santa Claus
    Easter is now... "Transgender Day of Visibility"

     
    Top Bottom