Roughly 850,000.
So, unless my math is off, it's 400ths of one percent.
.0004.
Roughly 850,000.
Exactly.I guess my question would be: how many convictions?
Generally, a “charge” will mean there’ more there than just an accusation, but who knows?
With convictions, we would have a better idea of whether the allegations are true.
You have a .00005% chance of being raped by a police officer in a year.
If you have a LTCH you have a 3% chance of using your handgun illegally.
3%?? From where did you pull that number?
That wasn't responding to you Kelly
400/850,000
= 4.7x10^(-4)
= .00047
= .047 percent
3%?? From where did you pull that number?
0.3% is significantly less than 3%, and Dr John Lott has it significantly less than 0.3%.Actually, I think it was .3% of people with LTCH would use them in a crime. Its been a while since I was involved with politics enough to look of the statistics.
Mine was a yearly stat. 45 and I used 900k.
Damn.
Good thing I'm no longer a nuke.
I forgot the 9 year thing.
400/9
=44.4
44.4/850,000
= 5.2x10^(-5)
= 0.000052
= .0052 percent
So does the FBI0.3% is significantly less than 3%, and Dr John Lott has it significantly less than 0.3%.
https://crimeresearch.org/2015/02/c...en-police-and-concealed-carry-permit-holders/
You'd have put the periscope through the hull of a yacht, or rammed a tugboat! Maybe wiped out all life on Earth or something.
Or caused neutron generation rate to be greater than 1 decade per minute.