US v Daniels - 5th Circuit panel overturns prohibition on firearm possession by current or former drug users

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Ark

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 18, 2017
    6,838
    113
    Indy

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit on Wednesday voided a federal law that prevents unlawful drug users from possessing firearms.

    The statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), bars anyone who is an "unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance," including marijuana, from possessing a gun. Violators can face up to 10 years in prison. However, a three-judge panel, citing the Supreme Court's landmark gun rights decision last year, unanimously found the statute unconstitutional as applied to defendant Patrick Daniels.

    Daniels, an admitted habitual marijuana user, was arrested in April 2022 after police searched his car and found marijuana and two loaded firearms. He was convicted in July 2022 and sentenced to nearly four years in prison and three years of probation — a conviction the 5th Circuit panel has now thrown out.



    Effect is limit to the Fifth Circuit for now.
     

    Ark

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 18, 2017
    6,838
    113
    Indy
    I bet Hunter is ecstatic at this ruling.
    "Aw man I shoulda bought that gun in Louisiana"

    Look, with all the bribe payments now exposed, I'm not exactly heartbroken if the gun charge ends up dropped by the wayside.
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,103
    113
    Martinsville
    With legal weed in most states, this is really a necessary ruling to avoid targeting law abiding citizens, even ignoring the constitutionality.
     

    IN New Guy

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jun 13, 2017
    86
    33
    Terre Haute
    The courts opinion ruled in favor of the individual caught with a small amount of MJ and a couple of handguns. Not an addict and not a pusher. The opinion stated it applies only to this individual but probably will be used in future cases as precedent.
     
    Top Bottom