Well, it didn't take him long to attack the 2nd admendment

[wtfd661]

Attorney General Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft.


Attorney General Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft. Hood Terror Attack


WASHINGTON, Nov. 19 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Before the Senate Judiciary Committee November 18th, 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder revealed a stunningly broad and aggressive anti-gun agenda.
"The President of the United States asked that politicians notuse the Ft. Hood attack to engage in 'political theater.' It appears those committed to attacking gun owners and the Second Amendment simply can't help themselves and are engaged in blaming guns and gun owners on the heels of this terrorist attack. Sadly it looks like 'politics as usual,'" said LEAA's spokesperson, Ted Deeds.
After explaining and defending his decision to give enemy combatants constitutional protections and the right to public trial in civilian courts, Attorney General Holder revealed his support for a national gun owner registration scheme and authorizing the government to ban firearm possession for any person by merely adding that person's name to the terror watch list.
Drawing reasonable conclusions from what Holder publicly said, we now know:

• Holder wants a national, permanent gun registration system administered by law enforcement. A registration of honest citizens that have cleared the federal background check for gun purchases with those records permanently retained by and shared among law enforcement.
• Holder wants new federal authority to prohibit any person on the federal watch list (reported to be 400,000 names) from buying guns and supports confiscating guns from those on the list who possess them.

Transcribing General Holder: "The position of the Administration is that there should be a basis for law enforcement to share information about gun purchases." "... [It's not] inconsistent to allow law enforcement agencies to share that kind of information, for that information to be retained and then to be shared by law enforcement." "It seems incongruous to me that we would bar certain people from flying on airplanes because they are on the terrorist watch list and yet we would still allow them to posses weapons." {Emphasis added}
LEAA's Executive Director Jim Fotis said, "Those behind the badge don't believe more restrictions on honest gun owners is a reasonable, practical or constitutional response to acts of terrorism. As a retired officer, I know that America's men and women in blue want to fight terrorism, to stop terrorists; not waste time keeping records on innocent gun owners!"
www.leaa.org

SOURCE Law Enforcement Alliance of America

 

[mettle]

Attorney General Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft.


Attorney General Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft. Hood Terror Attack


WASHINGTON, Nov. 19 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Before the Senate Judiciary Committee November 18th, 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder revealed a stunningly broad and aggressive anti-gun agenda.
"The President of the United States asked that politicians notuse the Ft. Hood attack to engage in 'political theater.' It appears those committed to attacking gun owners and the Second Amendment simply can't help themselves and are engaged in blaming guns and gun owners on the heels of this terrorist attack. Sadly it looks like 'politics as usual,'" said LEAA's spokesperson, Ted Deeds.
After explaining and defending his decision to give enemy combatants constitutional protections and the right to public trial in civilian courts, Attorney General Holder revealed his support for a national gun owner registration scheme and authorizing the government to ban firearm possession for any person by merely adding that person's name to the terror watch list.
Drawing reasonable conclusions from what Holder publicly said, we now know:

• Holder wants a national, permanent gun registration system administered by law enforcement. A registration of honest citizens that have cleared the federal background check for gun purchases with those records permanently retained by and shared among law enforcement.
• Holder wants new federal authority to prohibit any person on the federal watch list (reported to be 400,000 names) from buying guns and supports confiscating guns from those on the list who possess them.

Transcribing General Holder: "The position of the Administration is that there should be a basis for law enforcement to share information about gun purchases." "... [It's not] inconsistent to allow law enforcement agencies to share that kind of information, for that information to be retained and then to be shared by law enforcement." "It seems incongruous to me that we would bar certain people from flying on airplanes because they are on the terrorist watch list and yet we would still allow them to posses weapons." {Emphasis added}
LEAA's Executive Director Jim Fotis said, "Those behind the badge don't believe more restrictions on honest gun owners is a reasonable, practical or constitutional response to acts of terrorism. As a retired officer, I know that America's men and women in blue want to fight terrorism, to stop terrorists; not waste time keeping records on innocent gun owners!"
www.leaa.org

SOURCE Law Enforcement Alliance of America

He's just like his 'brotha Obama'... they both have no cognitive foundation in reality and respond (badly I might add) reactive instead of actually performing any proactive and reality thinking concerning problems....

actually.....

ALL democrats/liberals/some Republicans do this as well.

 

[bigcraig]

 

[mettle]

I was thinking that too.....

 

[2ADMNLOVER]

I was thinking that too.....

I don't know what you two are thinking (and don't wanna) but I am wondering if they make that device in the AK flavor ?

 

[mrjarrell]

Well, it's not gonna have any effect on me. I don't have any of those evil, nasty guns. Can't register what you don't have.

 

[jimbolucky13]

well everyone knows Holder is a genius, and also deserves a nobel prize.

so is he going to ban firearm ownership of military personal? that really doesn't sound like a good idea. It makes me wonder why people like him, and many others that I don't want to waste the time to mention, we all know them anyway, are even given permision to speak, or waste perfectly good oxygen for that matter. oops this just shook my memory up, and now I remember why I quit coming in to, and posting in the politics threads

 

[5.56'aholic]

Eric "Assbag" Holder can suck a fart out my *** if he thinks a psycho islam extremist is the justification for removing all Americans second amendment rights. By his very reasoning, we should remove all politicians from office and put them in them in jail to prevent stupidity from running rampant.

 

[Bruenor]

Transcribing General Holder: "The position of the Administration is that there should be a basis for law enforcement to share information about gun purchases." "... [It's not] inconsistent to allow law enforcement agencies to share that kind of information, for that information to be retained and then to be shared by law enforcement." "It seems incongruous to me that we would bar certain people from flying on airplanes because they are on the terrorist watch list and yet we would still allow them to posses weapons."

To Mr. Holder:

 

[Dryden]

What's the surprise?
Remember the strategy: "Don't let a good crisis go to waste."

He's following up on promises that we all knew were coming. Anyone also remember the real reason for last summer's ammo shortage?
It's Here.

 

[MyGlockRocks19]

What in the blind hell does a muslim extremist shooting at people on a military base have to do with civilian gun ownership? Especially considering HE WAS IN THE MILITARY!!!

If I were in charge tomorrow, he and every politician like him would be tried for treason. He knows EXACTLY what he's doing, and its NOT trying to save the citizenry from getting gunned down...at least not by each other.

Sorry...I'm so pissed off that I'm almost incoherent.

 

[Bigum1969]

I feel for all of you...

I lost all my guns in that tragic boating accident, or I'd really be pi$$ed!

 

[turnandshoot4]

, for that information to be retained and then to be shared by law enforcement." "

1. What makes you think they aren't doing this already? I believe they are.

2. How would that have helped Ft. Hood?

Again, gun control makes no sense. But if they took away gun what would they scare the masses with?

 

[jeremy]

Again, gun control makes no sense. But if they took away gun what would they scare the masses with?

Swine Flu...

 

[turnandshoot4]

Swine Flu...

Dang. There will always be something.

 

[Dryden]

Swine Flu...

Didn't Congress just pass the bill outlawing illness? The Senate is still debating on whether to classify California as a Disease-Free-Zone.

 

[jeremy]

Oh, and I almost for got Cuba. They are such a threat...

 

[BloodEclipse]

It seems incongruous to me that we would bar certain people from flying on airplanes because they are on the terrorist watch list and yet we would still allow them to posses weapons."

Was Hasan on the no fly list???????????
This statement is garbage.

 

[evansvillethompsongunner]

I was thinking that too.....

Yeah, green-tips just might do the trick.

 

[lumpy39us]

Next excuse will be the returning service members are mentally ill, therefore weapon removal justified. When I went to the VA they talked chatted with me, completed my assessment. Later I found it strange they kept asking me if I had been diagnosed with PTSD, I said no! Got me to wondering so I requested my records, Hey I got PTSD based on the conversation. Bottom line all military personnel are possibly mentally ill! Why would the admin want to remove the weapons from military, former and current? As I later found PTSD is a catch all mental disease being used as an excuse, I wish I knew that when I went to the VA. Be careful how you answer questions, when I'm engaging in conversation I'm happy and very willing to comply. No problems here!