What the media shouldn't do after a mass shooting

[Tsigos]

[ame="http://youtu.be/PezlFNTGWv4"]http://youtu.be/PezlFNTGWv4[/ame]

It is interesting what the forensic psychologist in the video says. Basically, we should not make these killers infamous if we wish to avoid more mass shootings.

 

[grogie]

I agree. Makes me wonder how many other sick bastards want to do the same thing for the attention alone?

 

[KLB]

All I can say is "duh".

Try to convince the media to shut up though.

 

[dobeluvr]

I agree also. I can name a bunch of mass murderers thanks to the media, and all the attention they get. Now for the good there was the cop that gave boots, another one gave a guy money for a ticket and then ohh wait thats all I can remember. As long as the media makes bad deeds famous there will continue to be copycats.

 

[JetGirl]

I also think they shouldn't interview little kids.

 

[JBLee]

I agree, they are, and should remain, innocent. To interview them as they have, connects them with the act. I would prefer that not be the case, naive on my part, maybe, yet to drag them through all this yet again, after the fact, just seems to be another example of how bad things have really gotten.

 

[actaeon277]

The media is interested in RATINGS.
They are NOT interested in a solution.

 

[BEANC0UNTER]

I also think they shouldn't interview little kids.

I had the exact same thought. I am not sure why you would subject them to any more than they have been already.

 

[Miketodd]

I say if they ban certain gun rights, we should ban certain free speech rights. Tit for Tat.