With regard to #6, although 9.6.5 is specific to scoring, 11.1.3 is specific to the challenge/appeal process.
In 11.1.3:
"Appeals – the Range Officer makes decisions initially. If the appellant
disagrees with a decision, the Chief Range Officer for the stage or area
in question should be asked to rule. If a disagreement still exists, the
Range Master must be asked to rule."
Notice they use the word "must" in the last sentence.
Just my interpretation.
[This what i got from HQ
Appendix C1 item 6 states when hit, if there is no evidence of a hit, it does not full fill the calibration process.
John
If you want to appeal a complete Mike/Miss on steel then I better get higher boots!
If I called a Mike on a popper still standing, then the shooter has the right to appeal. I would call the RM and let him look for evidence of a hit or not if the shooter thought he hit it.
So the answer is; "yes" the CRO can deny the calibration challenge due to no evidence of a hit. At that point, the shooter is challenging the scoring, thus the RM is brought in to verify the evidence.
The shooter is not appealing a Mike. The shooter is challenging the calibration.
It would be a crock of ****.What if Metcalf goes out and touches the steel?
I know this was a joke but..What if Metcalf goes out and touches the steel?
The shooter engaged the popper. The popper did not fall. There is no evidence of a hit. I will call it a Mike.
What if Metcalf goes out and touches the steel?
It would be a crock of ****.
The only time he would get a reshoot would be if a RO did it.
That is why it is a crock of ****. <<That is a quote.