Something I find hard to grasp is that guns "gain" value from the time they're purchased to the time they're resold.
Has anybody else noticed that guns are often attempting to be sold for more than what they paid for them in a gun store / online gun retailer? I'm talking about Glocks and Springfields, often cases even Hi Points and Taurus's.
My Glock 23 Gen3 fired 700~ flawless rounds. I picked it up brand new for $449 late 2010 at local gun shop. After a month's wait and numerous counter-offers I settled to sell it for $400.
My Springfield Armory XD-40 Service fired 100 flawless rounds. I picked it up brand new through GunBroker.com for $445 late 2009. In a desperate attempt, at the time, to pay my rent I sold the gun for $310 to my local gun shop; after no offers.
My Taurus PT-845 fired 300~ very flawed rounds. It had many FTF and FTE problems, and even at one point lost its' firing pin. Sent it to Taurus got a quick fix and quick turnaround. Wouldn't even attempt to fire the gun again as the firing pin in me in the chest upon firing the gun, I didn't trust it. Paid $386 brand new from BudsGunShop early/middle of 2010, got $275 trade in at local gun shop.
**************************************************
Now what I am REALLY getting at
**************************************************
(referring to ingo and armslist classifieds)
Springfield Armory (Essential Series, no belt accessories) XD series pistols are trying to be sold USED with Two mags (not the three free mags you could be receiving from SA until Nov. 30th) for at least $20 higher than the selling price of online retailers. Example? I could either buy somebody's XD-40 4" Service for $450 from the classifieds, or go to BudsGunShop.com right now and buy an XD-40 4" Service with V10 ported barrel for $472, and receive three free mags on top of that.
Glock pistols, used or new are being sold for often one hundred over what you can find online.
Hi-Point and Taurus? I have no idea why. I often see them being priced the same or over what you can find online.
Are people not doing their research? Or are people really just hoping that the buyers in this market aren't doing it?
Does having a higher round count nullify the fact that you've added wear to your firearm and simply add to the Long-Running-Reliability factor? Where is the line drawn here?
Disclaimer:
I obviously know this thread will do NOTHING to impact prices. People are always going to try to charge what they think they can get out of something. But in the real world, something is only ever worth what somebody is willing to pay. And I don't see me spending more for less any time soon.
This is somewhat of a Rant. I want people's input on this, I really want to know why I can't seem to find the deals I used to be able to find.
Has anybody else noticed that guns are often attempting to be sold for more than what they paid for them in a gun store / online gun retailer? I'm talking about Glocks and Springfields, often cases even Hi Points and Taurus's.
My Glock 23 Gen3 fired 700~ flawless rounds. I picked it up brand new for $449 late 2010 at local gun shop. After a month's wait and numerous counter-offers I settled to sell it for $400.
My Springfield Armory XD-40 Service fired 100 flawless rounds. I picked it up brand new through GunBroker.com for $445 late 2009. In a desperate attempt, at the time, to pay my rent I sold the gun for $310 to my local gun shop; after no offers.
My Taurus PT-845 fired 300~ very flawed rounds. It had many FTF and FTE problems, and even at one point lost its' firing pin. Sent it to Taurus got a quick fix and quick turnaround. Wouldn't even attempt to fire the gun again as the firing pin in me in the chest upon firing the gun, I didn't trust it. Paid $386 brand new from BudsGunShop early/middle of 2010, got $275 trade in at local gun shop.
**************************************************
Now what I am REALLY getting at
**************************************************
(referring to ingo and armslist classifieds)
Springfield Armory (Essential Series, no belt accessories) XD series pistols are trying to be sold USED with Two mags (not the three free mags you could be receiving from SA until Nov. 30th) for at least $20 higher than the selling price of online retailers. Example? I could either buy somebody's XD-40 4" Service for $450 from the classifieds, or go to BudsGunShop.com right now and buy an XD-40 4" Service with V10 ported barrel for $472, and receive three free mags on top of that.
Glock pistols, used or new are being sold for often one hundred over what you can find online.
Hi-Point and Taurus? I have no idea why. I often see them being priced the same or over what you can find online.
Are people not doing their research? Or are people really just hoping that the buyers in this market aren't doing it?
Does having a higher round count nullify the fact that you've added wear to your firearm and simply add to the Long-Running-Reliability factor? Where is the line drawn here?
Disclaimer:
I obviously know this thread will do NOTHING to impact prices. People are always going to try to charge what they think they can get out of something. But in the real world, something is only ever worth what somebody is willing to pay. And I don't see me spending more for less any time soon.
This is somewhat of a Rant. I want people's input on this, I really want to know why I can't seem to find the deals I used to be able to find.