Why Did The Death Star Orbit The Planet?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • femurphy77

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Mar 5, 2009
    20,279
    113
    S.E. of disorder
    I'm nerding out right now watching the original Star Wars; the Death Star is currently orbiting the planet until the moon where the rebel base is located comes into range. Why didn't they just blast the planet which probably would have destroyed the moon either thru direct action or cataclysmic failure due to the planets debris or the sudden loss of the gravitational field from the planet?

    For the record I don't care for the "added" footage.:noway:
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Wouldn't that also necessarily have impacted (pardon the pun) the Death Star's own orbit? Perhaps not catastrophically, but if they were in geosync above the main planet and only had to wait for the moon, why risk it?

    I mean, that's a significant capital investment. If there was any damage (heaven forbid any workers' comp claims) due to losing the host planet's gravitational pull, there'd be a metric force-load of paperwork.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,050
    113
    Uranus
    You know what grinds my gears? An exposed thermal exhaust port that goes directly to the main reactor!
    And to then not disguise it in ANY way and just put it at the end of a long trench pointing directly to it!

    I mean, what kind of Nerfherder designs something like that!?
     

    femurphy77

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Mar 5, 2009
    20,279
    113
    S.E. of disorder
    Wouldn't that also necessarily have impacted (pardon the pun) the Death Star's own orbit? Perhaps not catastrophically, but if they were in geosync above the main planet and only had to wait for the moon, why risk it?

    I mean, that's a significant capital investment. If there was any damage (heaven forbid any workers' comp claims) due to losing the host planet's gravitational pull, there'd be a metric force-load of paperwork.


    That's my point, why even bother to geo-sync? They didn't when they blasted Alderan (or maybe I didn't pay close enough attention)
     

    femurphy77

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Mar 5, 2009
    20,279
    113
    S.E. of disorder
    You know what grinds my gears? An exposed thermal exhaust port that goes directly to the main reactor!
    And to then not disguise it in ANY way and just put it at the end of a long trench pointing directly to it!

    I mean, what kind of Nerfherder designs something like that!?

    And that's another thing; why make your attack run thru a heavily defended trench to try and drop a torpedo down a port 90 degrees to your path of travel. The port is unshielded, fire a laser cannon at the damn thing from the next parsec and be done with it!!!!
     

    tatic05

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    20   0   0
    Dec 3, 2011
    1,205
    38
    Ft. Wayne
    You know what grinds my gears? An exposed thermal exhaust port that goes directly to the main reactor!
    And to then not disguise it in ANY way and just put it at the end of a long trench pointing directly to it!

    I mean, what kind of Nerfherder designs something like that!?

    Probably a scruffy looking one...

    I'm nerding out right now watching the original Star Wars; the Death Star is currently orbiting the planet until the moon where the rebel base is located comes into range. Why didn't they just blast the planet which probably would have destroyed the moon either thru direct action or cataclysmic failure due to the planets debris or the sudden loss of the gravitational field from the planet?

    For the record I don't care for the "added" footage.
    noway.gif

    A little Google-Fu says...

    "They didn't make a microjump because Hyperdrive doesn't work in a gravity well. They probably didn't jump directly to a spot where they could target the moon immediately because they didn't know the precise location of the moon within Yavin's orbit, and they happened to come out of hyperspace on the wrong side of the planet. Besides, they were (at least Tarkin was) very overconfident, so what if it takes them a little bit to get around the planet?"


    http://www.reddit.com/r/AskScienceF...hy_did_the_death_star_wait_to_shoot_yavin_iv/
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    See, I think there's a more practical explanation - fuel consumption. If you don't need to waste fuel to get from point A to point B, but rather wait for your target that will inevitably arrive, just wait. The savings will look good on the annual performance review.
     

    Mr Evilwrench

    Quantum Mechanic
    Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 18, 2011
    11,560
    63
    Carmel
    The run down the trench was a [strike]ripoff of[/strike] tribute to that WWII movie "633 Squadron" based on the mission to take out a dam by rolling bombs into the bottom of it.
     

    rhino

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    30,906
    113
    Indiana
    You Star Wars nerds are tedious.

    Fire-up the netflix and watch episodes of the orginal Star Trek to improve your life.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,973
    113
    Mitchell
    I'm nerding out right now watching the original Star Wars; the Death Star is currently orbiting the planet until the moon where the rebel base is located comes into range. Why didn't they just blast the planet which probably would have destroyed the moon either thru direct action or cataclysmic failure due to the planets debris or the sudden loss of the gravitational field from the planet?

    For the record I don't care for the "added" footage.:noway:

    Because it was long ago, in a galaxy far away...

    They didn't have the Federation's technology. Otherwise they'd simply send Spock, in a one man, warp speed capable, intersystem ship, with some of the red matter, and poof!...no more planet.
     

    Rocket

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    28   0   0
    Jun 7, 2011
    886
    18
    Whiteland
    Cause it is in the script. Duh!! And if they just blasted thru there wouldn't be time for the fighter run down the trench. And Luke's time shooting womp rats back home would have been wasted, of course.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,050
    113
    Uranus
    Wouldn't that also necessarily have impacted (pardon the pun) the Death Star's own orbit? Perhaps not catastrophically, but if they were in geosync above the main planet and only had to wait for the moon, why risk it?

    I mean, that's a significant capital investment. If there was any damage (heaven forbid any workers' comp claims) due to losing the host planet's gravitational pull, there'd be a metric force-load of paperwork.

    Workers comp claims have already be pretty high with this project.

    [video=youtube;9bSZXucTH4A]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bSZXucTH4A[/video]
     
    Top Bottom