Thanks to everyone for the post and the responses. I have always wondered why a couple of my neighbors were so happy about buying their glocks. As far as looks, there is nothing, in my opinion, that is great. I have never shot one but I have never heard that they are anything special. It always seemed that they were a mid-priced pistol with a famous name and so many police departments use them.
I personally own a kimber 1911, baby eagle 40, sig p226 elite stainless 40 along with a couple of revolvers. I accurate with my baby eagle and my Ruger 22mag revolver but not so with my others but I have not shot my Kimber or Sig yet. They are both about 1-2 months old and just have not had any time to go shoot.
I am an amateur gun collector. Mainly inexpensive rifles and pistols and have recently changed my mind set of getting higher quality verse quantity so I dont see buying a glock and after reading this post, I do not see a reason that I should consider it.
Thanks again!!
To be honest, I don't know why Glock has the following that it does. It's a good gun, but it's not the holy grail of firearms that many hold them up as. I own them because I want a cheap, reliable gun in my collection of EDC weapons. I want something that I can take in places that tend to screw up the finish on a gun and not have to worry about it. I've actually had more issues with my Glocks than with 10 1911s I've owned, but once they are broken in, they work reliably.
Why buy a Glock? They can be bought cheap and sold for near the same money spent. They can be easier on furniture and car seats due to grip profiles and a lack of leather shredding checkering on the MSH. When I'm lying on my side, under a car in heavy gravel at a junk yard, with the pistol being ground into the rocks as I wrestle a part off of a car, a Glock makes a better companion than a 1911, no matter what 1911 it is.