that when it comes to defending rights to gun ownership that some liberal and conservative views don't co-exist. Seems like everyone would be on the same boat.
that when it comes to defending rights to gun ownership that some liberal and conservative views don't co-exist. Seems like everyone would be on the same boat.
......
dems like to control people,,,not help them...
............
Kinda like, don't ask for a hamburger your paying for to come without pickles.
Like was said, some people want full control over the population. Others believe that this country was founded on true freedom. You tell me who is pro-firearm and who is anti.
Never before in history has a country been built on the equality of the population, and not have a tsar, Pharaoh, king, or some other ruling monarchy. The president of this country was to preside over the federal government, not the people. We the people were in charge of what was presided over. Unfortunately as time has gone on, we have slipped away from our roots as independent people and closer to having a king.
id sure like the country im paying for to come without victimless crime laws,,,but i dont see the republicans letting me have freedom...
just got off the phone where i got your answers... you wont like it but at least youll know...
if gun owners voted democrat more,,,gun rights would do better in that party...
they dont see the need for guns
guns are violence and they dont like violence
dems like to help people,,,not hurt them...
no good comes out of guns
the people who have guns are the exact people who shouldnt---they say---if your driving around in a pickup with war and military stickers,,,confederate flag stickers,,,anti obama stickers,,,anti muslim stickers,,,your crazy or at least scary and you shouldnt have a gun
its a big cultural thing... a lot of democrats cant stand republicans and think they are dangerous people with bad tempers and ego issues... they dont think republicans are smart and they think republicans hate and want to hurt smart people... they think that getting rid of guns would make those people with the bad personality traits become more normal...
away
Define "victimless" crime... I very well may agree with you - but that's a little too nebulous. Are we talking drugs here? or what?
I strongly disagree. Morals are absolutely essential in politics. The trick is having the right ones.There is NO room for morals in politics.
No because several Republican presidents and the like were a big part of that and we all know that ONLY liberals control people for silly reasons.Define "victimless" crime... I very well may agree with you - but that's a little too nebulous. Are we talking drugs here? or what?
Well when you call out Daviess County specifically (Pike would've been better) it makes your point more agreeable. However, there are still places "worse." So to be honest, it's hard for me to say with 100% confidence on how "liberal" some of the Rep's are on drugs nowadays. There was a thread not too long ago with some interesting quotes though...In Daviess County, I'd agree with you, Ghost. Nationwide - very different issue, I believe. I'm hearing a LOT of Repubs start to echo that sentiment.
It's kind of like the fact that there are still "dry" counties around. They are just the last to acknowledge that the 21st Amendment happened. Some areas just change faster, some slower. (Sometimes a good thing, sometimes not - depends on ones point of view..)
All good, we can agree to disagree on that.
When a person commits a crime with a hg, you have to wonder if the anti gunners feel any guilt or association with that crime because they were opposed to the victims right to have a hg for self defense. They should feel guilty unless some are without conscious.