Please, those of you who might be considering the idea of remembering the Washington v. IN, which in a nutshell says that officer safety doesn't satisfy being disarmed for a subject who is cooperating, or has been removed from the situation (i.e. gun in car, subject outside of car with no easy access and being cooperative), please don't forget that State v. Richardson is also important, if not moreso, because the court said that once a valid LTCH is presented (seems to apply immediately when you people keep handing it over with your DL), nothing else can be asked or required of you pertaining to your weapons.
Good point! Thanks for the clarification- I'd have likely quoted the wrong one (since, while I know I need to read them both, I've not yet found time to do so.)
Rep inbound.
Blessings,
Bill