So, WTF is a duck walk?
Um.... A normal guy will walk a little weird after having their butt hole invaded.
So, WTF is a duck walk?
So, WTF is a duck walk?
Huh...
I would have thought your all knowingness that you would have this answer already...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSR5RAeN9N8
That's similar to what I could find, but couldn't find a video of two people "duck walking" someone...How does one(or two) "duck walk" someone?
MEPS was no problem, it was later during basic when they gave us our shots and issued our gear that was a pita (literally). That antibiotic shot they gave us in the butt cheek felt like they stuck a golf ball in my buttocks...it hurt for days!
That is your question...
In the Military I just Say Duck walk douchebag...
That's hilarious my current group of Privates here at Ft. Benning are always talking about that shot, not sure when you went through but it's apparantly still going strong.
Again, study up on the Reasonable Man Doctrine, because your assertions regarding the use of force are somewhat less than "reasonable", and if you followed through with what you said you'd do, you'd end up in jail or sued, and probably both, and you'd most likely lose in court on both ends.
USN '91 MEPS in Minneapolis then RTC Orlando followed by NTC Orlando....I made my recruiter guarantee me Orlando in writing. There is no way I was going to Great Lakes in Feb and Cali was closed for renovations at the time...When I got my orders at MEPS they said great lakes. I had a bit of insight though and knew that they didn't yet own me those orders were promptly returned and replaced with the correct travel papers. Oh, and I remember what the vial the injection came in said too, bi-cillin 1,000,000 units.That's hilarious my current group of Privates here at Ft. Benning are always talking about that shot, not sure when you went through but it's apparantly still going strong.
No, the litmus test is if a person intentionally ignores said sign. I'm not going to argue how the sign is posted.
Look Jack, I've made some comments on this thread so i'm just gonna go ahead and speak my peace and be done with it. Somehow I think things get missconstrued and blown out of proportion. I myself and some of the other posts i've seen have been portrayed as wanting to be lawless armed thugs just running around looking to cause trouble and disrupt somebodys business and get into fights with property owners and refuse to leave when asked to do so. That couldn't be farther from the truth. I've never heard about anything like that being posted or have any personal knowledge of someone attempting to do so. Most of it boils down to a dissagreement on what constitutes a trespass and what does'nt. So I have a hard time getting why someone else on the other side of the issue just automatically feel the need to get all bent out of shape and feel it's justified going all hands on from the get go when in all reality it's not warrented or even nessecary. For the record, if you had a business, whether it's a hypothetical one or not, and you asked me to leave I would do so no questions asked because I know at that point if I did not then I would deffintly no doubt about it be subject to a trespassing charge.You know the rodeo isn't a one man show. Lot's of people been there, a few more than once.
I'm no tuff guy that's why I'll make sure I don't need to be and this is all hypothetical for the main reason I'll never own a grocery store but it's not that far different from a lot of other things.
Warning on the door and told to get out, that's one extra. If I owned the store you would be messing with my money, making my job harder, and been warned at least once, may be twice, that's all it takes and the warnings and reactions vary with the mood I'm in but it get's bad pretty quick when those are involved. If I'm not happy on my own place you can bet the guy causing me to be unhappy is going to be as unhappy as I an all the help I can get can make them.
Well every one has their own crystal ball...
So I have a hard time getting why someone else on the other side of the issue just automatically feel the need to get all bent out of shape and feel it's justified going all hands on from the get go when in all reality it's not warrented or even nessecary.
I will acknowledge that, IF, you acknowledge that if someone were to do that the party being tossed would be seeing a pay check in the future as well...
It's not a legal option for enforcing your wishes, rules, posted policies, guidelines, etc.
There is a narrow allowance specifically for trespass:
...if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to immediately prevent or terminate the other person's trespass.
It's not a catch-all get-out-of liability shield to mandle, duck walk or throw people on their faces when they don't treat your rules like laws.
And how is a bouncer supposed to know if I intentionally ignored the shorts sign, or simply didn't/couldn't read it?
None of that matters to me. I'm not easilly swayed by anger and crotchetiness. When I choose to engage in a dicussion I look for level ground and try to present a point of view without all the undue rhetoric and chest thumping that just ends up clouding the issue.
You haven't read many of Jacks posts have you...?
He makes a career out of being angry & crotchety.
Not that he doesn't make some good points at times. It's just unfortunate that those points get overshadowed by all of his...well...anger & crotchetiness.
Probably 18 USC s1385.