Yes. That’s pretty much it.
ETA: A really bad thing about wokology is the "lived experience" doctrine. That codifies the legitimacy of the "movie" playing in the minds of "oppressed minorities" over all others. In a sense it's a circular reasoning. The movie itself is that we live in a world where minorities are as oppressed as they were during slavery, and Jim Crow laws, and that this is the lived experience of all minorities. There is an objective reality though. There is a world that lives apart from perception. Groups, like "oppressed minorities" are comprised of individuals, who have diverse experiences, each with different "lived experience", are not oppressed today, at least not anywhere near the same level of magnitude as 1860s, 1920s, 1950/60s. Society has progressed since then. Institutional racism is a term invented by qualitative social "sciences" I say that in quotes, because I don't think it's real science*) to continue the belief that America is and always will be deeply racist unless it is torn down and remade.
* There's no null hypothesis possible, hypothesis are unfalsifiable. If you can't prove that a variable doesn't matter, or that a hypothesis is false or bull****, it's not science. Prove using qualitative science that critical race theory is correct. It's correct because a bunch of phd ideologues say it is.
Last edited:
