IndyMonkey
Shooter
- Jan 15, 2010
- 6,835
- 36
I've served my share of drug warrants over the years.Macon, GA had "no-knock" warrants. They executed one against a drug house. The gang inside was at "war" with another gang. They shot the first officer through the door. Once they realized it was the police, they dropped their guns. Their response was that had the police identified themselves, the gang would not have fired. Maybe they would have and maybe they wouldn't, but the second guy in the door told me that the gang was genuinely surprised that it was the SWAT coming through the door.
Is it really worth this kind of trouble to prevent evidence from being flushed? I suppose that the argument could be made that the element of surprise is a good thing, but not against a group of people who are heavily armed and for all intents and purposes desperate.
Macon has done away with "no-knock" and many municipalities seem to be following suit.
I've served my share of drug warrants over the years.
No Knock is a BAD policy!!
I'd rather lose some evidence that lose someones life.
sorry shouldve added a comma there. I dont care who they are! I dont live the life of a criminal either so therefore NO ONE should be kicking in my door! If they do they die its that simple. As stated before I will protect my family and myself at ALL COST against ANYONE!I don't care if they ARE wearing identifiers such as "Sherrif"...you do NOT come to my home and enter dynamically. PERIOD. I commit no crimes, I break no laws. Let's call it what it is. If you make a mistake and attempt dynamic entry at my home, then lives will be lost.
Rep for that! Im glad we dont do them anymore! When I worked in KY we did and I didnt like it too much but it went with the job.Its way too dangerous,specially if your the first guy through the door!I've served my share of drug warrants over the years.
No Knock is a BAD policy!!
I'd rather lose some evidence that lose someones life.
Macon, GA had "no-knock" warrants. They executed one against a drug house. The gang inside was at "war" with another gang. They shot the first officer through the door. Once they realized it was the police, they dropped their guns. Their response was that had the police identified themselves, the gang would not have fired. Maybe they would have and maybe they wouldn't, but the second guy in the door told me that the gang was genuinely surprised that it was the SWAT coming through the door.
Is it really worth this kind of trouble to prevent evidence from being flushed? I suppose that the argument could be made that the element of surprise is a good thing, but not against a group of people who are heavily armed and for all intents and purposes desperate.
Macon has done away with "no-knock" and many municipalities seem to be following suit.
I agree. I could never enforce a law I thought was bad. Unlike some, I know I have a choice. I won't sell out my sense of right and wrong for a paycheck.
not just a bad law but one i also think is unconstitutional. i dont give a crap what the scotus interprits it to be. they will rule how it benefits their own agendas or those that own them.