Watching History channel 2 (i know...) and i think its "a history of beer", and they throw a stat up on the screen that says that 65% of homicides have alcohol involved....how would one verify this?????
being candid: if that were true, compared to whatever the percentage of homicides that are firearms related...(and assuming they didnt mean someone intentionally drowned another human in a vat of beer)...why wouldnt they try to just ban alcohol????
...........compared to the stats on how many homicides have firearms involved, it seems that it seems that alot more people thani anticipated are drowning people in beer...????
i feellike if they wanted to reduce the murder rate to evenlower than it is (down 50% in past 20 years) they could just ban alcohol.......that would make a much larger dent than banning 30 rnd mags......
jus sayin
being candid: if that were true, compared to whatever the percentage of homicides that are firearms related...(and assuming they didnt mean someone intentionally drowned another human in a vat of beer)...why wouldnt they try to just ban alcohol????
...........compared to the stats on how many homicides have firearms involved, it seems that it seems that alot more people thani anticipated are drowning people in beer...????
i feellike if they wanted to reduce the murder rate to evenlower than it is (down 50% in past 20 years) they could just ban alcohol.......that would make a much larger dent than banning 30 rnd mags......
jus sayin