Anyone else move to .40 or .45 for winter carry?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,897
    113
    Notice how closely it resembles the center test bullet from the hydra-shok 9mm. It passed through the front and back of a winter jacket, flannel shirt, undershirt, and the (pretty skinny) guy wearing it.
     
    Last edited:

    wtburnette

    WT(aF)
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    45   0   0
    Nov 11, 2013
    26,971
    113
    SW side of Indy
    That's something I'll just have to disagree with Mas on. There's a reason wallboard and heavy clothing are part of the FBI test protocol, and a bullet that plugs is going to have trouble with those tests. Resistance to plugging is a design difference, not a caliber difference. You'll find bullets in all the duty calibers that expand just fine through Carhartts, leather coats, etc. in the real world as well as doing well in testing. You'll also find bullets in all the duty calibers that do not expand in the same circumstances.

    While penetration depth in clear gel doesn't correlate to "official" gel, these tests can show you which expanded reliably and which didn't:

    https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self-defense-ammo-ballistic-tests/#9mm

    HSTs offer extremely consistent expansion in either 9mm or .45 in the heavy clothing test. Old school Hydra-shoks don't expand consistently in either caliber. See below, 9mm on top and .45 on bottom.

    HST:

    1-9mm147JHPHSTFedPrem-2.jpg

    1-45acp230JHPp45hst2sFedPrem-2.jpg


    Hydra Shok:

    1-9mm135JHPpd9hs5hFederal-2.jpg


    1-45ACP230JHPHydraShokFed-2.jpg


    And I'll say that these tests and my real world observations match up very well, which validates the FBI protocol. I've got some pics in my phone of some hydrashoks that passed through multiple layers of clothing. I'll see if I can upload it.

    Ok, it's uploaded in the next post.

    The lucky gunner tests and the lower price of the HST's convinced me to switch a couple of months back. Always nice to hear more validation of my choice :yesway:
     

    88E30M50

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Dec 29, 2008
    22,779
    149
    Greenwood, IN
    I've switched over to HSTs in just about everything. I still carry Golden Sabers in my .40s but even there, have about half of the pistols loaded with HSTs. The 230g standard pressure HSTs have become my standard for .45s. For 9mm, it's all 147g HSTs now. The BoneFrogGunClub.com price coupled with the performance make them a no-brainer.

    I think what Mas was saying is not that bigger calibers perform better but that if there is a chance of sub standard expansion, he wants the bullet to be big anyway.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,897
    113
    I think what Mas was saying is not that bigger calibers perform better but that if there is a chance of sub standard expansion, he wants the bullet to be big anyway.

    And my counterpoint is there's not much chance of substandard expansion due to clothing if you pick the right bullet, regardless of caliber, as shown by both testing and real world results.
     
    Top Bottom