He's probably referring to the numerous brass to the face/weak ejection/finish issues.
Mine spit brass in my face, and glock ended up replacing the pistol.
He's probably referring to the numerous brass to the face/weak ejection/finish issues.
Or the main defect: not being a Gen 3.He's probably referring to the numerous brass to the face/weak ejection/finish issues.
This was the handgun ISP was seriously considering before they went with Sig. The Sgt in charge of firearms at the time told me he visited their plant and was very impressed. The plant was spotless and used the same quality control as their M16 (and M4 now maybe?). He couldn't stop saying enough good things about the company and the handgun.
My FS9 is quite accurate.
Have you tried shooting with different backstraps to see if that's an issue? MOST people, even big burly manly men will shoot the gun better with the smaller backstrap installed vs. the larger two. That may also be the reason you shoot your Shield better - it fits better in your hand. Have you had anyone else shoot your FS to see if it may be the gun vs. the shooter? Because, generally speaking, accuracy issues with guns have to do with the shooter - not the hardware itself.
That said, wasn't there a hubub several years ago about the rifling twist rate in the M&P pistol not being fast enough or some such?
why would the military purchase a side arm that required an after market barrel?
M&P's are junk.
Mine run just fine. They are .45s, though, a full size and a compact. I've never owned one of the 9mm ones, unless you count my Shield, which I wouldn't trade for 2 Glock 43s.