Beth Moore is a tremendously poor teacher, even if women preaching was biblical (it isn’t). She relies on emotionalism and feelings, but is a terrible exegete of Scripture. Pick a teaching of hers at random, and see how quickly she flees off the pages of the Bible. She has supported some of the worst of the prosperity teachers (from Joyce Meyer to the Osteens), yet the SBC still promotes her.
As a pastor in a technically SBC church, I think the writing is on the wall. The Social Justice/Critical Theory advocates are all over leadership. I don’t think leadership has the stomach for this fight—or they approve of her. It won’t be long before it boils over.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Some INGO heads are exploding trying to figure out which group they hate more.
Some INGO heads are exploding trying to figure out which group they hate more.
Haven't read the decision. I remember Clarence Thomas saying once that the key for him is coercion. If no one is being coerced to recognize or accept a particular religion, displays are fine....but that's him.
Thomas' concurrence is more along the lines of "the establishment clause doesn't apply to states" (which, incidentally, I agree with).
Gorsuch's concurrence was "being offended isn't standing."
The world's going to hell. I was listening to NPR instead of talking about Catholics they were talking about southern baptist.