If Kerry and H Clinton had won "but lost" it would be "this is how the system works, deal with it."
I wonder if INGOs attitude would be different also?
If Kerry and H Clinton had won "but lost" it would be "this is how the system works, deal with it."
They're only doing this because Bush2 and Trump won "but lost".
If Kerry and H Clinton had won "but lost" it would be "this is how the system works, deal with it."
That's an interesting statement to make... I don't think it's impossible to find it (at least in some cases, and could be a bit easier to find if it required as much of a process to do as our govt seems to impose on exercising other rights) ... but your argument is that if it was found, then it wouldn't be good voter fraud, does that mean it did not happen? Seems a bit circular.
We need to make it law In every state that you dip your finger in the ink to vote. Besides showing ID.
We need to get the dead off the voter lists. We need to stop multiple voting. Democrats are usually against playing fair and they always stomp their feet and get their way. Republicans nation wide need to stop being nice. Treat Democrat politicians like the criminal scum bags they are.
They're only doing this because Bush2 and Trump won "but lost".
If Kerry and H Clinton had won "but lost" it would be "this is how the system works, deal with it."
There's little doubt in my mind that voter fraud is occurring on a massive scale. IMO three million is just the tip of the iceberg. The left and their lapdogs the national media will continue to deny, deny, deny because it is overwhelmingly to their benefit.
It’s instructive how the Dems are always looking for a shortcut or an angle to achieve power, rather than appealing to a majority of people in a majority of states. If they’re programs are so popular, why can’t they develop broad appeal?
Well this effectively kills third parties too
This isn't new. Nor is it limited to Connecticut.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact
(and as aside, have we considered that is California is split into 3 states it will have 6 senators meaning what used to be California will have 4 more electoral votes than it has now?)
Well, we're going to drag our feet on the California thing until after the magnitude 8.0. Without the LA and Frisco megapolis's it should be a much friendlier place
There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Technically it's impossible to prove one way or another, since it wouldn't be very good voter fraud if it were found. And even if what you propose is true, it defaults to one side being more guilty of it, than the other, which seems to be more based on bias confirmation than fact.
How would the proportionate assignment of electoral college votes play out? Would it be similar to popular vote? If New York upstate Republicans were represented proportionately, would it make a difference? Most of Illinois is Republican except for Chicago metro?