That sounds like him.According to Eric Holder, it is not possible to commit a hate crime against a white person.
That sounds like him.According to Eric Holder, it is not possible to commit a hate crime against a white person.
They are. Unless you're saying that "whites" needs to specifically stated in such laws, which of course doesn't make any sense.
According to Eric Holder, it is not possible to commit a hate crime against a white person.
The media and most politicians are pushing the "white is inherently bad" narrative. Don't believe that?
Go ask GPIA7R to give you about 1000 links to stories about how "math is white supremacy" "time is white supremacy" "milk is white supremacy" etc. etc.
It's the new hotness in identity politics and it's getting more prevalent.
Going out on a limb and going to say that the vast majority media and politicians don't check any of the ethnic minority boxes. So if it's white people suggesting that other white people are inherently bad, that's something ya'll need to handle in-house.
Yes, among libs "white guilt" is a BIG thing. It's a mental problem.
An example of how ****ed up it has gotten...
This girl took a DNA test to find out what african tribe she was descended from and she FREAKS out and gets angry when she finds out she has european ancestry.
This is what happens when you invest so much in making your whole identity be about one thing. I think it's better for people to make their identity be about their character rather than seeking out a tribe. I think she would be more successful at life being a responsible, educated woman of high character, who happens to have some African DNA, than to make the primary attribute of everything she is, being an African American woman of a particular tribe. The latter seems utterly valueless to me.
About her heritage, first, I can look at her and see that there is some white ancestry. Second, why care? Big deal. It's not the worst thing that she can learn about herself. Third, why is it that she acts like she's 100% European? Doesn't the African ancestry on her mother's side count? After all, somewhere along her ancestry, a black dude married a white woman. Why doesn't that count? And why doesn't the ancestry on her paternal side count? It's absurd to count only the maternal ancestry. If it's about tracing her DNA to an African tribe, males have contributed to her DNA too, and it's pretty obvious that she does have some African ancestry. If she's thinks she's 100% European, it's kinda hard to explain her complexion now. Fourth, she's an attractive, reasonably intelligent young lady. There's no reason she can't be successful in life. It would be way more productive for her to focus on making a good life for herself than making so much of her identity fantasy.
Going out on a limb and going to say that the vast majority media and politicians don't check any of the ethnic minority boxes. So if it's white people suggesting that other white people are inherently bad, that's something ya'll need to handle in-house.
Doubtful... this is an example of just how differently we view things. You had an immediate assumption without even really thinking about what you were actually saying.
Did you even watch the video? I didn't assume that out of thin air. SHE SAID SO! She said like 5 generations ago on her mother's side, a white woman of European descent married a black man.
No. Not really. It's an ideology shared by both black people and white people. It's also virtue signaling. When the cameras are rolling they have a different opinion. For example, the recent exposure of Jim Jefferies in New Zealand by someone who left his phone recording an interview.
Don Lemon is a racist **********.
Does his man "friend" know?
Mea Culpa. But that chick doesn't know what she's talking about.
Going out on a limb and going to say that the vast majority media and politicians don't check any of the ethnic minority boxes. So if it's white people suggesting that other white people are inherently bad, that's something ya'll need to handle in-house.
This is what happens when you invest so much in making your whole identity be about one thing. I think it's better for people to make their identity be about their character rather than seeking out a tribe. I think she would be more successful at life being a responsible, educated woman of high character, who happens to have some African DNA, than to make the primary attribute of everything she is, being an African American woman of a particular tribe. The latter seems utterly valueless to me.
About her heritage, first, I can look at her and see that there is some white ancestry. Second, why care? Big deal. It's not the worst thing that she can learn about herself. Third, why is it that she acts like she's 100% European? Doesn't the African ancestry on her mother's side count? After all, somewhere along her ancestry, a black dude married a white woman. Why doesn't that count? And why doesn't the ancestry on her paternal side count? It's absurd to count only the maternal ancestry. If it's about tracing her DNA to an African tribe, males have contributed to her DNA too, and it's pretty obvious that she does have some African ancestry. If she's thinks she's 100% European, it's kinda hard to explain her complexion now. Fourth, she's an attractive, reasonably intelligent young lady. There's no reason she can't be successful in life. It would be way more productive for her to focus on making a good life for herself than making so much of her identity fantasy.
How could she? She's a white chick after all.Mea Culpa. But that chick doesn't know what she's talking about.
How could she? She's a white chick after all.
Imposing something on someone else would be more like a gay couple seeking out a bakery whose owner who disagrees with them so they could force the baker to do the thing he disagrees with. To say that declining to do something is imposing one’s beliefs is essentially taking the position that one has a right to another’s labor.