Don't repeal Indiana's gun permit law

[myhightechsec]

If Indiana has constitutional carry, then there's no reason for further bureaucracy, at the cost of all taxpayers. If one wants a LTCH, then they should pay for it themselves, and be taxed for all associated devices (i.e. background checks). No way that should be passed on to everybody.

Good idea. Let's apply that to every other aspect of life in our country and our taxes will drop to virtually zero as we all pay individually for the things we individually use.

 

[HoughMade]

That is in the interest of the individual, not the state.

Every once in a great while, the State does something to help its citizens exercise their rights elsewhere. Rare, but true.

 

[Thor]

If IN has unlicensed/constitutional carry why would an IN DL not suffice for reciprocity? I think a note could be added to the DL to indicate a person was not a proper person for carry reasons...like an F for felon similar to the M for motorcycle.

 

[Kutnupe14]

If IN has unlicensed/constitutional carry why would an IN DL not suffice for reciprocity? I think a note could be added to the DL to indicate a person was not a proper person for carry reasons...like an F for felon similar to the M for motorcycle.

Man, putting and "F" for felon on a license would create a #$%&storm I don't even want to imagine. Just attach it to the license electronically.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

That is in the interest of the individual, not the state.

The State of Indiana has an interest in promoting interstate commerce and the individual civil rights of its citizens.

 

[singlesix]

Man, putting and "F" for felon on a license would create a #$%&storm I don't even want to imagine. Just attach it to the license electronically.

Have to agree, the Scarlet Letter. Hard enough for a former felon.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

If IN has unlicensed/constitutional carry why would an IN DL not suffice for reciprocity? I think a note could be added to the DL to indicate a person was not a proper person for carry reasons...like an F for felon similar to the M for motorcycle.

Indiana does not prohibit possession of firearms by all felons.

 

[Thor]

Indiana does not prohibit possession of firearms by all felons.

Then don't put it on their license?

 

[Thor]

Man, putting and "F" for felon on a license would create a #$%&storm I don't even want to imagine. Just attach it to the license electronically.

That would be fine if it worked for reciprocity.

 

[Thor]

Have to agree, the Scarlet Letter. Hard enough for a former felon.

It's just one of the stupid prizes they get to win for playing stupid games.

 

[singlesix]

It's just one of the stupid prizes they get to win for playing stupid games.

Isn't the prize time served?

 

[Thor]

Isn't the prize time served?

Not if they've been released and can't be trusted to exercise their constitutional rights in civil society.

 

[2A_Tom]

If Indiana has constitutional carry, then there's no reason for further bureaucracy, at the cost of all taxpayers. If one wants a LTCH, then they should pay for it themselves, and be taxed for all associated devices (i.e. background checks). No way that should be passed on to everybody.

According to the ISP at the last session the Nine Million dollars they took in pays not only for the LTCH program and all employees involved, but is also spread around to technology that helps to identify criminals during stops. The person desiring an LTCH does and will pay the gcosts.

 

[2A_Tom]

That is in the interest of the individual, not the state.

Very Statist of you.

 

[2A_Tom]

It's just one of the stupid prizes they get to win for playing stupid games.

So is it impossible to be a real person again?

 

[singlesix]

Not if they've been released and can't be trusted to exercise their constitutional rights in civil society.

So who determine this? You?

 

[HoughMade]

Not if they've been released and can't be trusted to exercise their constitutional rights in civil society.

Then why were they released?

[edit]

...and I'm still trying to find the part in the Constitution where the said that felons couldn't have firearms...

"Constitutional Carry", y'know.

 

[Thor]

Then why were they released?

That is an excellent question.

 

[Thor]

So is it impossible to be a real person again?

I would say not, but if they are they shouldn't limited in their rights.

 

[gglass]

Not if they've been released and can't be trusted to exercise their constitutional rights in civil society.

Then they should not go free!