Just sad. I am sure some Anti and Lawyers are leading this move.
I would say yes you are correct.
Twist and spin.....twist and spin.
Just sad. I am sure some Anti and Lawyers are leading this move.
...and the march to me having no sympathy for anyone continues...
Wasn't the gun owned the mom so marketing to young men doesn't hold
It's all about killing PLCAA. They need to be able to go all tobacco industry on gun makers.
With huge legal fees for the families.How does this end in anything but more frustration for the families?
With huge legal fees for the families.
Doesn't PLCAA have a "you owe opposing counsels fees if bringing a prohibited action" clause?
Ah, that and the KS&E ruling must have been what I was thinking of.Don't think so. It would have to be under other federal law or state law. The Lucky Gunner fees award was under state law.
Wait.George W. Bush didn't do anything for gun owners. I read it on INGO so I know it is true.