He is a backer for the lost treat
The Law of the Sea Treaty = LOST sovereignty | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Ron Paul 2012
Not to be critical but this article is from 2007. My question is who else backed this treaty and if it is in effect now, what have the repercussions been so far?
Not to be critical but this article is from 2007. My question is who else backed this treaty and if it is in effect now, what have the repercussions been so far?
I was just curious as to how the subject of that article actually affected things. I know election times are times that things like this come up. I'm not really a supporter of any of the current candidates so I'm not disagreeing with anyone, like I said just curious.
It makes a difference in two important regards. First, it gives the UN sovereignty over roughly 2/3 of the surface area of the planet. Second, the United States has pledged fealty to the United Nations as a superior entity rather than an organization previously lacking sovereignty over anything. This is a huge step forward for transferring power from sovereign nations to the UN....
Wrong. There's no loss to anyone's sovereignty unless you're a pirate.
For the most part, the UN is feckless. Why do you ascribe so much power to them?
Not to be critical but this article is from 2007. My question is who else backed this treaty and if it is in effect now, what have the repercussions been so far?
Wrong. There's no loss to anyone's sovereignty unless you're a pirate.
For the most part, the UN is feckless. Why do you ascribe so much power to them?
Wrong. There's no loss to anyone's sovereignty unless you're a pirate.
For the most part, the UN is feckless. Why do you ascribe so much power to them?