Trunk Monkey. Its been on here before.
you serious?
I think this is what you are looking for.IC 35-47-8-1
"Electronic stun weapon" defined
Sec. 1. As used in this chapter, "electronic stun weapon" means any mechanism that is:
(1) designed to emit an electronic, magnetic, or other type of charge that exceeds the equivalency of a five (5) milliamp sixty (60) hertz shock; and
(2) used for the purpose of temporarily incapacitating a person.
As added by P.L.318-1985, SEC.3.
IC 35-47-8-2
"Stun gun" defined
Sec. 2. As used in this chapter, "stun gun" means any mechanism that is:
(1) designed to emit an electronic, magnetic, or other type of charge that equals or does not exceed the equivalency of a five (5) milliamp sixty (60) hertz shock; and
(2) used for the purpose of temporarily incapacitating a person.
As added by P.L.318-1985, SEC.3.
IC 35-47-8-3
"Taser" defined
Sec. 3. As used in this chapter, "taser" means any mechanism that is:
(1) designed to emit an electronic, magnetic, or other type of charge or shock through the use of a projectile; and
(2) used for the purpose of temporarily incapacitating a person.
As added by P.L.318-1985, SEC.3.
IC 35-47-8-4
Applicability of handgun provisions
Sec. 4. IC 35-47-2 applies to an electronic stun weapon or taser.
Good news, I talked to the lady and she's willing to carry a knife and pepper spray.
She's just concerned about the legality concerning concealed weapons in cars and concealed weapons while operating under a Public Passenger Chauffeur's License.
I dont think there is any problem but I want to make sure.
Well, it's a start. I guess.
Frankly, I would say screw the legality. What's that phrase? Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6, or questioned by the SVU division of the local PD?
Don't most cabs have the "glass" between the front and rear passenger compartments now?
I've ridden in several downtown, and I've never been in one that had any type of separation between the rear and front compartments.