Hillary: Gun Confiscation ‘Worth Looking At’

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Que

    Meekness ≠ Weakness
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 98%
    48   1   0
    Feb 20, 2009
    16,373
    83
    Blacksburg
    I was really hoping that title was accurate. I was going straight to FaceBook! Unfortunately, it would be pointed out quickly that she was referring to a gun buyback and not confiscation. She hides her true intentions and is smart enough to not say that.
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,276
    113
    Merrillville
    I was really hoping that title was accurate. I was going straight to FaceBook! Unfortunately, it would be pointed out quickly that she was referring to a gun buyback and not confiscation. She hides her true intentions and is smart enough to not say that.

    A "mandatory buyback" is confiscation.
    But, various anti-gun people will still make the claim "no one is coming for your guns".

    (No Que, I'm not saying you believe it. Just using your line)
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    When someone says that, counter with "Then why not get rid of all privately owned cars?"

    (whine) Because cars are made to transport people and do good things, but guns are only used to kill people!(/whine)

    Never mind that all those people killed with or in cars are just as effing DEAD, and I don't think they give a rat's tuchus HOW they got that way!

    :ranton:
     

    LEaSH

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    43   0   0
    Aug 10, 2009
    5,816
    119
    Indianapolis
    So insane. Only a criminally insane person would imagine such a folly:

    1. Introduce a "buyback"
    2. Confiscate
    3. The money used to buyback the firearms was already our own money.
    4. Hillary guffaws wildly like the hyena that she is.
    5. ...
     

    beararms1776

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 5, 2010
    3,407
    38
    INGO
    So insane. Only a criminally insane person would imagine such a folly:

    1. Introduce a "buyback"
    2. Confiscate
    3. The money used to buyback the firearms was already our own money.
    4. Hillary guffaws wildly like the hyena that she is.
    5. ...
    #5. No thanks.:)
     

    GIJEW

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Mar 14, 2009
    2,716
    47
    How can the government buy back something it didn't sell in the first place? :scratch:

    Also, they should try that with the guns they did sell first......... you know...... to the mexican cartels.
    eric holder just GAVE those guns to the cartels on our dime in order to plant them on mexican crime scenes. If the purchasing agent from narco-gangsters inc. actually paid retail--or even wholesale--for semi auto replicas of full auto weapons they could get at 1/2 the cost on the latin surplus market, with some grenades tossed in the deal, he'd end up being one of those decapitated corpses found in a mexican ditch.
     
    Top Bottom