So you insulted what he liked. When he didn't ask for your opinion? Then you get upset about his response and make a thread on the Internet about it?
I feel stupider for even reading this thread.
If you have on of them fancy IPhones you should have shown him the Yeager video where he comes right out and says that all people who carry .40s have little male genitals.
Online gun forum ... good analogy. I always thought that people adopt a certain online persona when hiding behind a keyboard, and that the stuff they spew online they would never speak in person.
Maybe not with gun nuts.
Brother you should see the looks I get when I tell them I dont like Glocks or the 40 ....You would think I took a Dump in their Cheerios
Some think I am the ANTI-CHRIST when they walk into the shop and see me carrying a 5 shot .357 revolver . or a beretta 92 compact
Oh, how I would enjoy such an encounter.So I was in my favorite LGS the other day with a friend of mine. He was looking in the case and seen one he liked the looks of (he's not a gun guy). Looked at it myself and said that I liked the looks of it, but not the caliber. It was a .40. Said that I didn't like the caliber (Not saying its a bad round, just don't like it for some reason) and would rather have a .357 than .40. Well this other random guy started in like I just told him to go screw himself.
His words were "Well, why not? A .357 is just over-penetration. Shoot someone with that and they're just gonna keep coming after you. The .40 does the same thing as a .45 when you shoot someone with it." The only thing I got in was "Well, I like .45." He cut me off and kept on going on about how great the .40 was about the time I started ignoring him and started looking at the 1911s.
I'd put money on it that he carries a .40, lol. I'm still wondering what made him go off like that. It wasn't in a conversational tone either. Sounded like he was just about to the point of yelling at me for not liking the .40. I really don't know.
Anyone else ever have someone just jump into the middle of your conversation like that? Not to offer advice, but to basically chew you out with how much they know?
Brother you should see the looks I get when I tell them I dont like Glocks or the 40 ....You would think I took a Dump in their Cheerios
Some think I am the ANTI-CHRIST when they walk into the shop and see me carrying a 5 shot .357 revolver . or a beretta 92 compact
Oh, how I would enjoy such an encounter.
I would have responded that the .40 is a solution to a problem yet to be defined.
It has neither the capacity of the 9mm nor the power of the .45 but has more violent recoil than both. In actual shootings the .40 performs no better than 9mm with good defensive loads. There's a reason most top trainers use 9mm's and why we're seeing a resurgence in its popularity after the last 15 years of everyone jumping on the .40 bandwagon... they're now starting to jump off.
I feel vindicated because I never bought into the .40 hype. I have exactly zero .40's in my gun safe now days.
The .40 caught on for the same reasons 10mm did back in the late 1980's. The FBI adopted it after having a knee-jerk reaction to the Dade County shootout. When the FBI does something, everyone follows suit it seems. The FBI picked up the 10mm and suddenly every Tom, Dick and Harry had to own one. Many top manufacturers of the day brought a 10mm pistol to market. Then the FBI went to the infamous "FBI load" because the full power Norma 10mm loads that made it so effective were a bit much for some agents. The "FBI load" evolved into the .40 S&W and the FBI dropped the 10mm like a hot potato. Within a few years the 10mm fell out of favor and most everyone stopped making new guns chambered for it -- it darn near killed it. Everyone then clamored for the .40 S&W.
As a testament to the recoil comment I made above, if new agents can't qualify with the Glock 22 they will be issued a Glock 17 to re-qualify with. If they qualify with the Glock 17/19 they can carry it on duty. The FBI also allows for the carrying of the Glock 21 if agents qualify with it.
If the FBI adopted the .357 SIG you would see a run on .357 SIG handguns and within a few years the .40 would be clogging up the used gun racks across the nation.
Meanwhile, I'll stick with 9mm and .45 ACP.
^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^ I have "bad" wrists, and the .40, is just too much for me. I like my 9mm, and my .45 much better !!!!!You know what? He will get over it! Im on your side. Im not a fan to the .40 either. I own a 9mm and a .45. I carry the .45!
^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^ I have "bad" wrists, and the .40, is just too much for me. I like my 9mm, and my .45 much better !!!!!
No offense to those with merely a preference, but I have a couple of Glocks in .40, and suffer the same from fools that tout the inferiority of both the make and caliber.
Its strange that in every objective demonstration of both, scores with high marks. Its also strange how both the pistol and caliber has fulfilled every need that I've had occasion to require it.
Don't get too excited, I'm just a regular guy that likes guns. The only difference is I have a YouTube channel, but then there's millions of people with YouTube channels. I'm not really all that special...OMG YOU COMMENTED IN ONE OF MY THREADS!!! I FEEL SO SPECIAL!!! Lol, just kidding, but it is nice to have one of the actual gurus (I guess you could say that) leave some knowledge and facts among the crazies in here, me included
So I was in my favorite LGS the other day with a friend of mine. He was looking in the case and seen one he liked the looks of (he's not a gun guy). Looked at it myself and said that I liked the looks of it, but not the caliber. It was a .40. Said that I didn't like the caliber (Not saying its a bad round, just don't like it for some reason) and would rather have a .357 than .40. Well this other random guy started in like I just told him to go screw himself.
His words were "Well, why not? A .357 is just over-penetration. Shoot someone with that and they're just gonna keep coming after you. The .40 does the same thing as a .45 when you shoot someone with it." ...
I would have responded that the .40 is a solution to a problem yet to be defined........