One of the things that pushes me to a longer (14.5, 16") barrel for my defensive/goto AR is the fact that I live in the country and it is overwhelming likely that it's only use will be to kill four legged predators that eat the family's livestock/pets.
Those shots might be at a little distance, but are not what the op is referring to, so I should keep that in mind.
I bet a 10.5" would be really handy in a situation like the op described. You do lose velocity, but like you guys have pointed out. We have a lot of data on 10.5" barrels being used against people and they apparently do quite the job at distances described in the op.
I hope you are proud of yourself, Hohn.
I have not bought even so much as a single AR upper/lower/grip/optic/magazine in at least 4years and now you have me really wanting to build/buy a 10.5" pistol during the tightest market I have seen since I bought my first one years ago....
Mumble, grumble, thanks alot INGO.
I hope you are proud of yourself, Hohn.
I have not bought even so much as a single AR upper/lower/grip/optic/magazine in at least 4years and now you have me really wanting to build/buy a 10.5" pistol during the tightest market I have seen since I bought my first one years ago....
Mumble, grumble, thanks alot INGO.
This is what I put together for short range social work should I ever find myself in that situation. Its a DD 10.5 upper with an older Eotech. It rings steel well at 200 yards, so I have no doubt that it will work for situations under 10 yards.
Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
This is what I put together for short range social work should I ever find myself in that situation. Its a DD 10.5 upper with an older Eotech. It rings steel well at 200 yards, so I have no doubt that it will work for situations under 10 yards.
Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
barrel length | Remington UMC 45 gr. JHP | Remington UMC 50 gr. JHP | Remington UMC 55 gr. MC |
18" | 3354 | 3179 | 2983 |
16" | 3257 | 3076 | 2943 |
14" | 3099 | 2901 | 2878 |
12" | 2943 | 2964 | 2724 |
10" | 2776 | 2682 | 2616 |
8" | 2536 | 2478 | 2380 |
6" | 2189 | 2153 | 2041 |
5" | 1939 | 1921 | 1861 |
4" | 1709 | 1674 | 1564 |
3" | 1277 | 1276 | 1147 |
10" barrels are so long ..... suitable for a .308, however !
In 5.56, drop down to an 8" barrel, and you'll only lose another 235 fps.
Graph courtesy of Ballistics by the Inch.
.223 Rifle Results in fps
Click here for a Muzzle Energy graph for the tests in this caliber.
barrel length Remington
UMC
45 gr.
JHPRemington
UMC
50 gr.
JHPRemington
UMC
55 gr.
MC18" 3354 3179 2983 16" 3257 3076 2943 14" 3099 2901 2878 12" 2943 2964 2724 10" 2776 2682 2616 8" 2536 2478 2380 6" 2189 2153 2041 5" 1939 1921 1861 4" 1709 1674 1564 3" 1277 1276 1147
I'm thinking of building a 10.5" 556 it will be shooting Speer 75gr Gold Dots so thinking 1-7 maybe 1-8 twist.
However, right now not happening unless I find a lower, and parts,, upper and parts at pre Covid, Riot, Election Gun rush prices.
Didn't say it was a bad idea. I love my 10.5" barrel Ruger AR pistol. ......just that if you want to go short, another 2" shorter doesn't have much effect.So loosing 300 fps has some of you folks thinking a 10" is a bad idea. Really....
I have been buying the matched sets (upper/lower) from the Standard Mfg. Co. They are not "CHEAP" (man I hate that word when used in relation to guns and gun parts) but these rival any I have ever seen. Getting the rest of the bits and pieces is a challenge right now. The Ingo classies helped me towards finishing the one I have on the bench presently.
Didn't say it was a bad idea. I love my 10.5" barrel Ruger AR pistol. ......just that if you want to go short, another 2" shorter doesn't have much effect.
I gotcha, amigo !Not directed at you wild man. Some folks get a bit picky (and thats fine of course) about these things I guess.