Well now you have to name names.
Nope. That will not be happening.
Well now you have to name names.
Uspsa production and IDPA ssp equipment rules are (or at least were when I used to shoot IDPA) very similar. I used to use the same gun for both. I made GM with a G34 that was wildly modified... Sites, grip tape, and a taran connector [sarcasm]. the CZs/clones have become popular, and are in some regards better, but Vogel has proven the very top guys can still do well with a nearly stock Glock. I could try to buy my way up with better guns, but it wouldn't get me much in real performance... The money spent would do better to be invested in ammo. That I don't finish as well in majors as I used to is due to my lack of practice while everyone else has been working hard, not because everyone else is spending coin on tangfos.
My limited gun is also wildly modified... A G35 with the same mods as my production gun. I've beat a lot of folks shooting very pricy 2011s. As for all the guys who beat me, I give credit to the shooter, not the gun (even if I might drool over their gun).
someone using equipment race as an excuse to not shoot matches, is, frankly, just looking for excuses... And to be really frank, probably not only excuses for not shooting, but probably for sucking also.
-rvb
I was just discussing what I have seen and observed with different categories and the eagerness to add new categories everytime a new marketing thing comes up. And that can make it an equipment race (like the example of 6 shot revolvers are no longer competitive due to capacity). Not much of an excuse not to shoot just one of the irks. It has more pros than cons as both do.
I was just discussing what I have seen and observed with different categories and the eagerness to add new categories everytime a new marketing thing comes up. And that can make it an equipment race (like the example of 6 shot revolvers are no longer competitive due to capacity).
Can we ban 'rule threads'?
Can we ban 'rule threads'?
It appears they suck the life out of every shooting sport.
The 8 shot revo is an example where USPSA, IMO, screwed the pooch. (But it barely pegs my give-a-sh meter because, well, it's revo. ). But Ok you've got an example.... I don't see how it relates to the discussion above about production... Nor do I see how adding divisions inherently creates an equipment race.
-rvb
World shoot is run by a different organization, IPSC. It has nothing to do with USPSA. USPSA is affiliated with IPSC only that membership in USPSA enables participation in the IPSC world shoot, but they are not the same. There are very few ipsc matches in the US. Ipsc is a whole different rule set. 10 vs 15 in production is one of many, many differences between the two.
Now your playing lawyer ball. Here's why I disagree with your statement. There are IPSC matches just within the US they are under USPSA rules where outside the US UPSC falls under IPSC rules. Look at the match descriptions of an IPDC match at say Wildcat Valley and look at that same match description on a world shoot or outside the CONUS IPSC club match.
Calling Rhino to chime in.
Now your playing lawyer ball. Here's why I disagree with your statement. There are IPSC matches just within the US they are under USPSA rules where outside the US UPSC falls under IPSC rules. Look at the match descriptions of an IPDC match at say Wildcat Valley and look at that same match description on a world shoot or outside the CONUS IPSC club match.
Calling Rhino to chime in.
TOO MANY RULES............