This question popped in my head from another thread and I didn't want to turn the thread with my question.
If Indiana gun owners are willing to take the class necessary to garner a Utah carry license/permit in order to legally carry in other states, then why are so many staunchly opposed to having a training requirement in Indiana, which will meet the qualifications other states impose to meet their reciprocity requirement?
I must be missing something very simple, so be gentle.
If Indiana gun owners are willing to take the class necessary to garner a Utah carry license/permit in order to legally carry in other states, then why are so many staunchly opposed to having a training requirement in Indiana, which will meet the qualifications other states impose to meet their reciprocity requirement?
I must be missing something very simple, so be gentle.