critter592
Sharpshooter
Earlier argument and the guy came back at 2am kicking in the door.
Man killed during break-in attempt
Man killed during break-in attempt
I would have waited until the door was kicked in to pull the trigger. Lawyers will eat him alive for shooting through the door.
Texas allows people to shoot through the door if someone is trying to break in. Edie Brickell & New Bohemians Keyboard Player Shot to Death by Girlfriend's Neighbor After Domestic Spat - Celebrity Gossip | Entertainment News | Arts And Entertainment - FOXNews.com This guy aimed high but the guy outside was 6'5" and shot him in the head. No charges filed.
Indiana law does say that you can shoot to prevent forcible entry:
Indiana Code 35-41-3
IC 35-41-3-2
Use of force to protect person or property
Sec. 2. (a) A person is justified in using reasonable force against another person to protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person:
(1) is justified in using deadly force; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
if the person reasonably believes that that force is necessary to prevent serious bodily injury to the person or a third person or the commission of a forcible felony. No person in this state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting the person or a third person by reasonable means necessary.
(b) A person:
(1) is justified in using reasonable force, including deadly force, against another person; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent or terminate the other person's unlawful entry of or attack on the person's dwelling, curtilage, or occupied motor vehicle.
(c) With respect to property other than a dwelling, curtilage, or an occupied motor vehicle, a person is justified in using reasonable force against another person if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to immediately prevent or terminate the other person's trespass on or criminal interference with property lawfully in the person's possession, lawfully in possession of a member of the person's immediate family, or belonging to a person whose property the person has authority to protect. However, a person:
(1) is justified in using deadly force; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
Please note highlighted part, you don't know if he went to get a gun, but you are preventing forcible entry. You claimed loudly that you would shoot them, they have not left and are still kicking in the door. I think one would know the difference between banging on the door loudly and trying to kick it in.
So as to "lawyers doing him in", that probably won't happen if the letter of the law has been followed and the homeowner doesn't try to spout off bravado. You fear for your life and you are in your home, you have no obligation to retreat and every right to fire, weapon or not in the other jackarse's hand. You are in fear and they are trying forcible, NONAUTHORIZED entry.
No way would I back myself against a wall in my own house. If it takes place on my property I will not retreat and will be charging the person. There is only 1 time when I would retreat all others I'm charging and shooting. That 1 event that could happen is if I pulled in the driveway when nobody was home and an intruder was in the house. I'd back out and call 911.Well like I said it may be legal but it doesnt sound right to me.
I would not take someones life unless I really have to and I will give myself the duty to retreat even if the law says that I dont have that duty to retreat.
If someone breaks in I will probably step back while ordering that person to stop to give him more chance to stop.I would only shoot if I cant retreat anymore like if im back to a wall or if that person is getting to my loved ones.I would also not shoot if I can stop that person otherwise.
What if someone enters your house in the middle of the night (you didnt lock the door).You point a gun at him, ask him to stop and he still walks towards you.You shoot him and kill him like you can legally do.
Was it legal?
Yes.
Was it right?
Well you tell me after you learned more about the person who walked in your house and that you killed.
This person had mental illness, he thought he lived here or maybe he lived here years ago and since he had alzhameir he forgot that he doesnt lived here anymore.
Due to his mental illness he didnt understand that gun pointing at him and your commands was a threat to himself and didnt stop walking towards you.
Maybe he was deaf, didnt see your gun as you were standing in the dark and didnt hear your commands.
It was legal to shoot him ... but was it right?
Not everything legal is right just like not everything right is legal.
What if someone enters your house in the middle of the night (you didnt lock the door).You point a gun at him, ask him to stop and he still walks towards you.You shoot him and kill him like you can legally do.
Was it legal?
Yes.
Was it right?
Well you tell me after you learned more about the person who walked in your house and that you killed.
This person had mental illness, he thought he lived here or maybe he lived here years ago and since he had alzhameir he forgot that he doesnt lived here anymore.
Due to his mental illness he didnt understand that gun pointing at him and your commands was a threat to himself and didnt stop walking towards you.
Maybe he was deaf, didnt see your gun as you were standing in the dark and didnt hear your commands.
It was legal to shoot him ... but was it right?
Not everything legal is right just like not everything right is legal.
Which one do you want? Want to be a martyr, but at least you and your murdered family are "moral" in not shooting a nutjob or do you want to live? The world isn't what movies and fiction make it to be.
I would have waited until the door was kicked in to pull the trigger. Lawyers will eat him alive for shooting through the door.
While you have to know what the law in your state allows you to do regarding the use of lethal force, what you may allow yourself to do is different and what you thing is the right thing to do should still command your actions.
Even if I lived in Texas and it would be legal to kill someone by shooting through my dront door I still wouldnt do it and act like I mentioned in my previous post.
I just dont think its right to take someone's life just because that person is about to break into your home when your life is not in danger yet.
Just because its legal doesnt mean its right.But the idea of what's right and wrong depends on who you are.
Its also true the other way around, even if something is illegal I can still be thinking that its the right thing to do.
For exemple if I feel that myself or my loved ones are in serious danger and I feel it could be a threat to my or their lifes I would use lethal force even if it not legal for me to do so.
I do what's right for me first then I do what's right according to the law.
I think lots of people think the same way.
Im talking about serious life or death situations here of course.Not about thinking that its right for me to drive over the speed limit.
If what I feel is the right think is also legal then its the best scenario for me.
the basic right to live and to protect your loved ones trumps any law of man. they can sit on their bench and think they own me but they dont.