Minneapolis Police Shoot Unarmed Woman In Pajamas — With Bodycams Off

[T.Lex]

Nothing to worry about. Everything is fine. Muslim LEOs are peaceful just like their religion.

https://pamelageller.com/2017/10/ar...y.html/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/...s-to-blow-up-law-enforcement-training-academy

College beefs up security following threat from former cop - KXXV-TV News Channel 25 - Central Texas News and Weather for Waco, Temple, Killeen |

interesting that the local media doesn't say that he is muslim, but I'm sure it has nothing to do with anything.

Every bumpstock owner is peaceful, just like their stock.

 

[Fargo]

IBBBI

I laughed out loud at that one, not in the Internet sense, but in the sense that I actually laughed out loud. Well played.

 

[chipbennett]

IBBBI

Rep Nazis got me again:

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Kutnupe14 again.

 

[Route 45]

Every bumpstock owner is peaceful, just like their stock.

In all fairness to bumpstock owners, their bumpstock instruction manual probably doesn't instruct them to kill anyone.

 

[lonehoosier]

Officer who fatally shot Justine Damond turns himself in; charges pending Officer who fatally shot Justine Damond turns himself in; charges pending | Fox News

 

[Kutnupe14]

Officer who fatally shot Justine Damond turns himself in; charges pending Officer who fatally shot Justine Damond turns himself in; charges pending | Fox News

What? I thought he would have run off long ago and rejoined his underground terrorist cell.

 

[T.Lex]

What? I thought he would have run off long ago and rejoined his underground terrorist cell.

He can't.

They're anti-cop.

 

[printcraft]

In all fairness to bumpstock owners, their bumpstock instruction manual probably doesn't instruct them to kill anyone.

 

[HoughMade]

He can't.

They're anti-cop.

Wait...was his terrorist cell a bunch of overweight, white militia types?

 

[T.Lex]

Wait...was his terrorist cell a bunch of overweight, white militia types?

Don't judge.

They identify as muslim confederates.

 

[luger fan]

Wow. Think what they do to poor Mary Tyler Moore for LITTERING with her hat.

 

[drillsgt]

What? I thought he would have run off long ago and rejoined his underground terrorist cell.

Nope, just a regular old jail cell.

 

[SwikLS]

https://apnews.com/3a70aec6397b4ae8...ter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true


Family sues for $50M

 

[SwikLS]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mohame...19-04-30/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=66776526

 

[chipbennett]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mohame...19-04-30/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=66776526

The correct verdict, IMHO. Though, police officers do get a certain... benefit of the doubt that other citizens do not:

[FONT=&quot]The jury considered three charges against Noor. They acquitted Noor of second-degree murder, which would have required a finding of [/FONT][FONT=&quot]intent to kill[/FONT][FONT=&quot], but no premeditation. The third-degree murder conviction required a finding that Noor acted recklessly and with a "depraved" mind, but with no intent to kill. Noor was also convicted of second-degree manslaughter, which required a finding that Noor acted with "culpable negligence" and created an "unreasonable risk" of causing death or great bodily harm.[/FONT]

When a police officer isn't squeezing the trigger, typically speaking, pointing a gun at someone and firing a round is prima facie evidence of "intent to kill". Reckless action would be negligently discharging a firearm.

Regardless, Noor is going to prison for a long time.

 

[Expat]

I am a bit surprised by the verdict.

 

[SwikLS]

I agree it was the correct verdict, but the whole ordeal raises a larger issue of muslim officers. I don't see how a devout muslim LEO can reconcile their oath to the constitution and devotion to sharia law. If they are in conflict, where does a muslim LEO's allegiances lie? Some in this thread have called it a diversity hire. I'm not sure about that, but I think if that's true, its a minor matter compared to an issue of allegiance to the constitution vs the quran if they are in conflict. In other words, departments can have all the diversity hire policies they want, but if an officer or potential recruit demonstrates a clear intention to use their authority to enforce sharia law over constitutional law, that ought to be grounds for dismissal or a major strike against hiring that person.

 

[IndyDave1776]

I agree it was the correct verdict, but the whole ordeal raises a larger issue of muslim officers. I don't see how a devout muslim LEO can reconcile their oath to the constitution and devotion to sharia law. If they are in conflict, where does a muslim LEO's allegiances lie? Some in this thread have called it a diversity hire. I'm not sure about that, but I think if that's true, its a minor matter compared to an issue of allegiance to the constitution vs the quran if they are in conflict. In other words, departments can have all the diversity hire policies they want, but if an officer or potential recruit demonstrates a clear intention to use their authority to enforce sharia law over constitutional law, that ought to be grounds for dismissal or a major strike against hiring that person.

You have raised an excellent point with an obvious answer. I would also ask about admitting people of suspect loyalty to the Constitution and republic in the first place, never mind placing them in positions of authority.

 

[SwikLS]

You have raised an excellent point with an obvious answer. I would also ask about admitting people of suspect loyalty to the Constitution and republic in the first place, never mind placing them in positions of authority.

and in most departments across the country they are probably very aware of this issue. its probably really only a few departments in a few places that might have policies and practices that are cause for concern.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

I agree it was the correct verdict, but the whole ordeal raises a larger issue of muslim officers. I don't see how a devout muslim LEO can reconcile their oath to the constitution and devotion to sharia law. If they are in conflict, where does a muslim LEO's allegiances lie? Some in this thread have called it a diversity hire. I'm not sure about that, but I think if that's true, its a minor matter compared to an issue of allegiance to the constitution vs the quran if they are in conflict. In other words, departments can have all the diversity hire policies they want, but if an officer or potential recruit demonstrates a clear intention to use their authority to enforce sharia law over constitutional law, that ought to be grounds for dismissal or a major strike against hiring that person.

You have raised an excellent point with an obvious answer. I would also ask about admitting people of suspect loyalty to the Constitution and republic in the first place, never mind placing them in positions of authority.

BehindBlueI's could probably address your concerns...