Mueller report delivered

[JeepHammer]

No further indictments.

Looks like it was exactly what Trump said it was, a "witch hunt".
I'm sure this is not the end...

Not a "Witch Hunt" since there were several contacts with Russians, but clumsy meetings and not indictable offenses.
The question came up, it was investigated, there was contact, but not criminal contact between Trump & Russians directly.

Trump's staff however,
With 34 indictments, it's a start on "Draining The Swamp"...
I'm sure Trump didn't intend on starting with his own staff, but I'll take it how I can get it!

https://www.wsj.com/articles/mueller-indictments-whos-who-1531511838

How about we do the same to Mike Pense, Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell...

 

[printcraft]

Not a "Witch Hunt" since there were several contacts with Russians, but clumsy meetings and not indictable offenses.
The question came up, it was investigated, there was contact, but not criminal contact between Trump & Russians directly.

Trump's staff however,
With 34 indictments NOT RELATED TO COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA

FTFY

 

[KittySlayer]

Not a "Witch Hunt" since there were several contacts with Russians, but clumsy meetings and not indictable offenses.
The question came up, it was investigated, there was contact, but not criminal contact between Trump & Russians directly....

That could have been quickly investigated, resolved and put to bed because they were so clumsy and silly. Instead there was a "Witch Hunt" that took two years and $25m because there is no way Hillary could have lost because of her own failures as a person/politician.

 

[mmpsteve]

How about we do the same to Mike Pense, Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell...

You missed a few names, so I'll just start the list: Clinton, Comey, Loretta Lynch, Strohk, Page, Brennan, Clinton, Comey, Lynch ... oops, I repeated a few

.

 

[sht4brnz]

For those who are shocked and amazed that the government could waste so much money investigating claims which stretch the bounds of reality....

....let me share one foto.

Fast & Furious???

 

[Brad69]

What “Crime” Would anyone get VP Mike Pence for?

1. Praying too hard!
2. Not cursing

 

[Route 45]

What “Crime” Would anyone get VP Mike Pence for?

Failure to bake a cake.

 

[Expat]

What “Crime” Would anyone get VP Mike Pence for?

1. Praying too hard!
2. Not cursing

Refusing to go on dates with women other than his wife, of course.

 

[Alamo]

It's been more than three days since Mueller folded his tent, and I still can't find a "Hitler finds out Mueller didn't indict Trump for Collusion, Hair, Fake Tan, or even for being a Republican!" video.

What gives, internet? Oh, wait, I'll bet the RUSSIANS! RUSSIANS! squelched them! The fiendish bastards!

 

[KG1]

Not a "Witch Hunt" since there were several contacts with Russians, but clumsy meetings and not indictable offenses.
The question came up, it was investigated, there was contact, but not criminal contact between Trump & Russians directly.

Trump's staff however,
With 34 indictments, it's a start on "Draining The Swamp"...
I'm sure Trump didn't intend on starting with his own staff, but I'll take it how I can get it!

https://www.wsj.com/articles/mueller-indictments-whos-who-1531511838

How about we do the same to Mike Pense, Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell...

Where do you get that those 34 indictments were Trump’s “staff”?

If they were then there might be a case for collusion because a number of them were Russian individuals and 3 Russian entities that indictments were handed down for attempting to influence the election.

They had nothing to do with Trump.

 

[Alpo]

Given the build-up you gave the photo in your intro, I'm forced to conclude it is a climate change [STRIKE]rent-seeker[/STRIKE] 'scientist'. Or perhaps a string theorist?

I read above that Mueller spent $25 million. ... .... and then I thought I had heard that number before. ... ...
I don't remember how many prison sentences resulted from all of the money that Issa spent....

His predecessor, from Indiana, spent over $40 million and issued over 1,000 subpoenas.

So, I wonder why some of the membership express dismay that Mueller spent what he did under the orders he was given. Starr spent over $70 million.

 

[Phase2]

It's been more than three days since Mueller folded his tent, and I still can't find a "Hitler finds out Mueller didn't indict Trump for Collusion, Hair, Fake Tan, or even for being a Republican!" video.

What gives, internet? Oh, wait, I'll bet the RUSSIANS! RUSSIANS! squelched them! The fiendish bastards!

Didn't search very hard. ;-)

[video=youtube;7cVsmuxOj28]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cVsmuxOj28[/video]

 

[BugI02]

Darrell Issa, implying the investigation into Clinton's email was also a waste, I believe.

Wow. For there to be even a hint of equivalence there, shouldn't Trump have been cleared after a couple of months because he didn't intend to collude (determined after, of course, being allowed to decide what subpoenaed evidence he was willing to turn over and having wide ranging immunity granted to anyone else peripheral to the case)

 

[printcraft]

Wow. For there to be even a hint of equivalence there, shouldn't Trump have been cleared after a couple of months because he didn't intend to collude (determined after, of course, being allowed to decide what subpoenaed evidence he was willing to turn over and having wide ranging immunity granted to anyone else peripheral to the case)

He might have been guilty of obstruction of justice if he had wiped his servers "like with a cloth" or bleachbit or something.

 

[Alpo]

Wow. For there to be even a hint of equivalence there, shouldn't Trump have been cleared after a couple of months because he didn't intend to collude (determined after, of course, being allowed to decide what subpoenaed evidence he was willing to turn over and having wide ranging immunity granted to anyone else peripheral to the case)

I'm still waiting to read the report. All this "vindication" back-slapping is fine. There was not an indictment of the president. But....aren't you at least curious as to what the report says? After all, the finest lawyers in the land drafted it.

 

[mmpsteve]

Darrell Issa, implying the investigation into Clinton's email was also a waste, I believe.

So you're saying there was a real investigation of Clinton's email? Not you, I mean the poster of the photo of Issa.

.

 

[BugI02]

I'm still waiting to read the report. All this "vindication" back-slapping is fine. There was not an indictment of the president. But....aren't you at least curious as to what the report says? After all, the finest lawyers in the land drafted it.

I see the other side has 'bitter clingers' of its own

Not really curious about the report, I've always believed it was political in nature and a fishing expedition

Once a Trumper, always a Trumper


ETA: Finest lawyers in the land? I'm too old to laugh that hard

 

[2A_Tom]

How dare you call someone afflicted with TDS by such a pejorative as bitter clinger, Bug?

 

[mmpsteve]

After all, the finest lawyers in the land drafted it.

Fixed that for you.

.

 

[Alpo]

Ahhh well. I'm really not that curious to read a long report, but I would like to read a cogent summary of the investigation once it is released. If you are referring to me as a bitter clinger....you would be mistaken.

As to "obstruction"...it seems to me that every man has a right to do all that is within his power (short of bribery and murder) to protect his status as an individual citizen. I wouldn't cooperate with any of the hyenas.