They just wanted to see if the kid was holding an unregistered gun. That's all.While I see that they have to investigate to see if a claim is false or true....
They wouldn't have to investigate if someone called and said they saw a picture of the kid watching TV.
Or a kid sitting in a car.
or a lot of other scenarios.
Well, they'll be no danger to me and my family though. These pictures involve a Marlin 60, Single Six, and a J.C. Higgins bolt gun, respectively, not the evil assault M&P 15-22 in the New Jersey pic.
When I was in high school, I asked about a pellet gun I saw at a 5&10 near the Jersey shore. The clerk asked if I had a FOID card, that I needed one to even *touch* the Crosman rifle. Jersey is nuts.
I have a dumb question: Has the super troopers returned with a warrant, to what extent would the property owner be required to cooperate? Would he be required merely to allow access to the property, or to actively assist in such ways as unlocking a safe, as opposed to simply declaring 'there it is' and walking away?
I'm confused was this over a picture or someone saw a child (unsupervised) outside with a firearm?
I would question a minor with a firearm unsupervised. What would a warrant read if it would have been issued?
It appears during this political climate, our officials are forgetting they are simply public servants.