No Firearms Signs

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,594
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Say my Baptist neighbor and I are in my yard talking. Jehovah’s Witnesses come up the driveway and my neighbor has no patience for “cults”. So he asks them to leave. I say, wait. This is my property and I’d rather be welcoming and polite. They can stay.

    So who has the right of way here? A person has a right to own a business. A person doesn’t have a right to supercede the owner’s rights. It’s not a matter of being shielded from morals.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,897
    113
    Say my Baptist neighbor and I are in my yard talking. Jehovah’s Witnesses come up the driveway and my neighbor has no patience for “cults”. So he asks them to leave. I say, wait. This is my property and I’d rather be welcoming and polite. They can stay.

    So who has the right of way here? A person has a right to own a business. A person doesn’t have a right to supercede the owner’s rights. It’s not a matter of being shielded from morals.

    Can you make your neighbor stay and listen?

    This isn't about property rights, it's about being "forced to participate" and freedom of association, isn't that what the argument is? Nobody said the employee could make someone leave, etc. If the owner can say "no cake for gay wedding" can a employee baker also refuse to participate on making a cake that goes to a divorcee remarrying?
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,594
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Can you make your neighbor stay and listen?

    This isn't about property rights, it's about being "forced to participate" and freedom of association, isn't that what the argument is? Nobody said the employee could make someone leave, etc. If the owner can say "no cake for gay wedding" can a employee baker also refuse to participate on making a cake that goes to a divorcee remarrying?

    No. I can’t make my neighbor stay. It’s his choice to stay according to my rules, or leave according to his conscience. My property rights supercede his rights.

    This isn’t just about property rights or “forced to participate” or freedom of association. There are different kinds of rights involved. The underlying issue is what happens when rights collide.

    You have a right to seek out service. You don’t have a right to force the service provider to serve you if they don’t want to. You have the right to pursue employment. That right doesn’t supercede your employers policies that you agreed to as a condition of employment. You don’t want to participate in making the remarriage cake? Ask your employer if you can do something else. It’s his business. Your employment in a sane state is “at will”. If you’re a valuable employee, and the employer isn’t an *******, you probably won’t have to choose between your job and your conscience.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,594
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Trade what? Neighbors who don't like Jehova's Witnesses? Eh. I'll keep the one I have. He keeps his lawn mowed. And sometimes plows my driveway.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,897
    113
    So really, it's whatever argument supports the owner's decision in any particular situation? Almost feudal in its interpretation. Not really rights colliding, but who's rights.

    Well, best I can say is see where it gets you as businesses collude against a stigmatized group... and that group might just be gun owners. I hope you don't get the system you think you want, it might just bite us all in the backside.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,594
    113
    Gtown-ish
    So really, it's whatever argument supports the owner's decision in any particular situation? Almost feudal in its interpretation. Not really rights colliding, but who's rights.

    Well, best I can say is see where it gets you as businesses collude against a stigmatized group... and that group might just be gun owners. I hope you don't get the system you think you want, it might just bite us all in the backside.
    Don’t think of the most extreme version of what I’m saying. I’m not talking about logical extremes. Just logical conclusions. When rights collide, who loses most? Someone’s gonna lose. Are there other businesses eager to have your business? Maybe that’s a logical way to decide this one. It’s reasonable to argue that it should be the one who has the most to lose. Today, that’s usually the business owner.
     
    Top Bottom