I couldn't finish it. They should just stick to guns.
Here's what Dana Loesch said, in full context:
[video=youtube;aq7jnowk0kk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq7jnowk0kk[/video]
If you take more umbrage with Dana Loesch's response to ilk such as the NY Daily News, than you do with the disgusting things said by the NY Daily News and others of their ilk, then you might be uncomfortably close to the NY Daily News and others of their ilk.
Here's what Dana Loesch said, in full context:
[video=youtube;aq7jnowk0kk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq7jnowk0kk[/video]
If you take more umbrage with Dana Loesch's response to ilk such as the NY Daily News, than you do with the disgusting things said by the NY Daily News and others of their ilk, then you might be uncomfortably close to the NY Daily News and others of their ilk.
That "word a day" calendar is really paying dividends!!!
Dismiss a growing segment of the population. Great strategy, NRA.
What, the godless left?
I agree with GFGT's agreement.I agree with Dana....and Chip and Indiucky.
I couldn't finish it. They should just stick to guns.
I couldn't finish it. They should just stick to guns.
That's what I'm questioning: whether it's a net benefit to the discussion.Yeah, their focus should be gun rights, but they shouldn't be afraid to synthesize these concepts into a larger world view when the expression of that view can benefit the discussion.