Yikes! That's not accidental.
With the video we are likely arguing Reckless Homicide vs. Knowingly or Intentional.
He shot him from retention. He meant to do it.
Look at him dance around. He is amped up and does not know what to do, so he gets the gun out. People that act like Officer Happydance do not shoot because there is a threat, they shoot to make themselves feel better.
We shall see if this turns into the BART case or if NYPD's political influence prevents a prosecution. Wait and see.
Oh, almost forgot. NYPD will shortly be blaming the victim for running out of the store.
"Our brave officer made the best decision he could given the facts at the time. The deceased had a responsibility not to get himself shot by one of us."
Would it be fair to say that hizzoner the mayor bears some culpability for being a skinflint who won't pay for adequate training such as to work this type of thing out in canned exercises rather than drilling real holes in real people?
Was the vic brandishing a piece? Can't see the vid on my phone. No piece = big lawsuit and bad shoot.
I do not agree that he purposefully shot an unarmed civilian.
Instead I saw the cop track the victim at high ready, and apparently panic-blast a round into an innocent man
Knowingly is not purposefully.
Recklessly is not purposefully.
We shall see if there is a criminal prosecution as in BART.
He was a panicked little puppy that's for certain.
However, given the lack of training that NYPD does it really does not surprise me to see this puppy behavior. You could do a dance video to his hopping about.
The problem is in New York City is that the brass do not want to train their officers as such training could produce a gun culture in the department. Guns are so hated in New York City that they would rather keep the police ignorant than train them.
If you talk to the gun school teachers who have been NYPD they will confirm it. Circillo and Rogers have terrifying stories.
I have had the same interactions with Boston cops. Absolutely clueless and it is by design.