Thank you.
The amoeba or protozoa are simple organisms, yes. Not only that, they do live on their own, so yes, they are alive and can be killed. This is not a discussion of the complexity of the organism being discussed. I raised the point of viability. A human cannot live as a zygote, which would be the single-celled parallel to your examples.
Again, my objection to abortion law is simply that government has yet again overstepped its bounds. We don't want them telling us how much water our toilets can flush or what kind of light bulbs we can purchase or what kind of guns we're *cough* allowed *cough* to own, but we're perfectly OK with them telling us something they have even less of a clue about. They don't know what the shoulder thing is that goes up, but they speak on guns. Most of them do not have uteruses, and many of the few who do no longer function as an effect of time, yet we allow them to tell us what we can or must have in our bodies. Oh wait, that's not true. We allow them to tell women what they may or may not and must or must not do with THEIR bodies.
I don't see any laws that tell a male that he MUST wear a condom.
I don't see any laws that require him to abstain from sex.
I don't see any laws requiring "chemical castration", other than for convicted rapists.
I don't see any laws requiring him to step up, rather than force the woman with whom he had sex to take him to court to obligate him to paying support for his progeny.
Leaving money out of it, I don't see any laws that force him to spend something far more valuable...TIME... with his children.
Of course, given some of the examples of sperm donors out there, I think that latter may be for the better.
Blessings,
Bill
My point was that it is alive, and being a human life, to end it is homicide. We do have laws against murder. (Most Liberty minded individuals will acknowledge the role of government in punishing murder, though I don't speak for all.) Those are typically state, not federal, laws. So if you want think of it in these terms, let's overturn Roe v. Wade with a decision that says this is a state issue, thus nullifying all federal abortion laws. Then we can decide as individual states whether this is murder or choice, trafficking in fetal tissue or research. The more local the decision, the more representative it is, anyway. I don't want any abortion, but I'll take less abortion if I can get it, and we can both get smaller government.