Meanwhile, back to the topic.
It seems that society has accepted the fact, through existing law, that civil rights trump property rights, which trump 2A rights.
It doesn't seem consistent to me, and I'll agree with the others who say that if I privately own property, even a business, I should be able to restrict access to anyone for any reason.
Should the government really have the power to force associations on private citizens? They clearly do, but I don't think they should.
Half of INGO thinks it's okay for the government to force property owners to allow their employees to have firearms on the property. It should come as no surprise that society would feel the same about the use of government to compel people to behave in particular ways.