I guess my point was a stock, as a design feature, is intended for shouldering a weapon. That in my mind would clearly exclude it as a handgun because it is not "designed or adapted so as to be aimed and fired from one hand". Seems like a lot of "law" is interpretation of language and definitions.
The ATF opinion letter was just a general bit of info related to some of the talk in this thread about transporting an SBR lower across states lines in different configurations, not a comment to Indiana's definition of a handgun. Configuration seems to determines classification, according to their opinion, so with a rifle length upper you wouldn't need a 5320 filed.
The ATF opinion letter was just a general bit of info related to some of the talk in this thread about transporting an SBR lower across states lines in different configurations, not a comment to Indiana's definition of a handgun. Configuration seems to determines classification, according to their opinion, so with a rifle length upper you wouldn't need a 5320 filed.
Last edited: