The Democrat Primary Race Is Filling Up

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,223
    113
    North Central
    It is meaningless to compare Trump's fundraising to that of the Dem. candidates at this time but not for that reason. Whichever Dem wins the nomination will almost certainly start the General Election campaign with a 'war chest' at or near $0, while Trump will likely have the full amount raised to that point.

    Glad to report you are off base there. The true state of affairs is the the democrats are involved in a primary election, behaving and spending like it. Trump is running a reelection campaign and has been for over a year.

    Since May 2018 -- when Facebook and Google began releasing advertising data -- the Trump campaign and the Trump Make America Great Again Committee have spent more than $33 million across the two platforms. By comparison, the Trump campaign has spent more than $7.5 million on traditional TV advertising during that period, according to data from Kantar Media/CMAG.


    The digital ads focus heavily on list-building and fundraising.
    "The difference between [Obama's] first election and his reelection -- he grew his list by about 50, 55%. We're going to grow ours about 300%. You know, maybe even 400%. We're already at 150% growth with our list size," Parscale told Fox.


    https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/07/politics/trump-digital-advertising-spending/index.html
     

    two70

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    19   0   0
    Feb 5, 2016
    3,758
    113
    Johnson
    Glad to report you are off base there. The true state of affairs is the the democrats are involved in a primary election, behaving and spending like it. Trump is running a reelection campaign and has been for over a year.

    Since May 2018 -- when Facebook and Google began releasing advertising data -- the Trump campaign and the Trump Make America Great Again Committee have spent more than $33 million across the two platforms. By comparison, the Trump campaign has spent more than $7.5 million on traditional TV advertising during that period, according to data from Kantar Media/CMAG.


    The digital ads focus heavily on list-building and fundraising.
    "The difference between [Obama's] first election and his reelection -- he grew his list by about 50, 55%. We're going to grow ours about 300%. You know, maybe even 400%. We're already at 150% growth with our list size," Parscale told Fox.


    https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/07/politics/trump-digital-advertising-spending/index.html

    :dunno: Trump has been raising a lot of money and spending relatively little of it. If anything the article you linked makes my point for me by pointing out that the Trump campaign has spent less on advertising in the last year and a half than the campaign brought in during the last month. His opponent, whoever that may be, has been raising less and has been/will be spending a much larger percentage because they are battling for the primary.
     

    Libertarian01

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jan 12, 2009
    6,015
    113
    Fort Wayne
    Lotsa people hated Obama, but the "Not Obama" campaign was a dumpster fire.


    True, but let us look at Obama's opponents.

    First, was McCain. He wasn't loved by the base. He was seen by many as being an extension of Bush, who wasn't liked at the time. Palin got the base FAR more energized than McCain ever did!

    Then we come to Romney. Romney looks better today but he did introduce state run health care in Massachusetts. He never really energized the republican base. They were happy to vote for him against Obama, but it ended there.

    Obama didn't have it easy, but he sure didn't have to scrape for every vote either. His core base of black Americans were as fired up for him as are the Trump supporters today. According to several reports from mid 2019 Trumps support is around 84% of republicans. That's going to be hard to beat by anyone.

    I was also thinking today that while many voters may not like what Trump does or says on Twitter or in public statements, they have put up with it for over three (3) years now. They have become inured to it. He is the devil they know. All he needs is a good economy and low unemployment in October and "BOOM! - Reelection.

    Regards,

    Doug
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,223
    113
    North Central
    It seems it seems that the dems are abandoning a once core constituency. That constituency is reaching out to deems but not getting any support from them. Kind of supports my realignment of the parties predictions.


    PITTSBURGH -- Darrin Kelly, president of the powerful Allegheny-Fayette County Central Labor Council, says that not one of the Democratic candidates running for president has reached out to him to ask about or listen to what union families in western Pennsylvania are looking for in a nominee to challenge President Donald Trump in November. "Not one," he says abruptly.


    Youngstown State University political science professor Paul Sracic said there is one thing that is strikingly clear about all of the Democratic candidates running for their party's nomination. "They are spending way too much time listening to elites that sit on their staff or advise them, or worse yet, taking the voters pulse from Twitter, and zero time listening to Midwest swing voters," he said. "It doesn't matter who politicians talk to, but it sure does matter who they listen to." He cautions that these repeated mistakes, in particular Biden's statement on fossil fuel workers, are no different than Hillary Clinton's tone-deafness in 2016.


    Whether it is the call for fracking bans or making demeaning quips about coding, it is those kinds of remarks directed at the families and the communities in western Pennsylvania that Allegheny County chief executive Rich Fitzgerald specifically urged the candidates running for the nomination not to do in a letter he sent to all of the campaign headquarters this past this year: "To win voters back in this region outside of Allegheny County, in Beaver, Washington, Butler and Westmoreland counties we need two things from the candidates; talk about the things that unite us and show up outside of the urban areas like Pittsburgh and Philadelphia and just listen to their concerns." Fitzgerald is a popular Democratic county chief who was about to be sworn in for his third term.


    Read the entire article here

    https://townhall.com/columnists/sal...anding-western-pennsylvania-to-trump-n2559052
     

    Phase2

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 9, 2011
    7,014
    27
    PZaD8IC.jpg
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom